All Topics

Comments discuss serious problems in China's economy, including real estate bubbles, massive debt, demographic challenges, hyper-growth fallout, and skepticism toward official figures and stability.

Cluster focuses on the Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) failure, debating causes like risky bond investments, interest rate hikes, VC-instigated bank runs, risk management failures, and implications for depositors, startups, and the banking system.

Discussions compare classical machine learning methods like SVMs, decision trees, random forests, and scikit-learn, questioning differences, advantages, and alternatives to a featured tool.

Discussions question claims of 'no moving parts' in mechanical designs, proposing alternatives like motors, steppers, servos, chains, slip rings, and counterweights for rotation and motion control.

This cluster features job advertisements, 'seeking work' posts, and freelance opportunities primarily for full-stack developers experienced in Python, Django, PostgreSQL, Angular, and AWS, with many remote positions in Europe and the UK.

This cluster centers on debates about how roads should be funded, primarily through taxes, tolls, or user fees, questioning whether they are public goods benefiting everyone or should be paid by users, with discussions on subsidies, maintenance, and externalities.

This cluster focuses on discussions about the potential for misuse, abuse, exploitation, and nefarious applications of a new tool, feature, or technology highlighted in the thread.

The cluster discusses police use of lethal force, particularly shootings of unarmed or non-threatening individuals, accountability for officers, comparisons to murder rates and executions, and criticisms of police impunity versus defenses citing risks to officers.

Cluster focuses on discussions about fan noise in computers, servers, and hardware, including experiences with silent vs. noisy fans, fanless designs, thermals, and recommendations like Noctua fans.

The cluster discusses the costs, price declines, and future projections of batteries, especially lithium-ion for EVs, home storage like Tesla Powerwall, and grid applications, including comparisons to other technologies and economic factors.

Discussions revolve around the historical dominance and stagnation of Internet Explorer (especially IE6) that hindered web progress, with many drawing parallels to Chrome's current market supremacy and potential similar issues.

This cluster features comments where users admit they have not read a specific book referenced in the discussion, often expressing curiosity or intent to check it out later. It reflects a common, repetitive response in threads centered around book recommendations or analyses.

Discussions center on the differences between Thunderbolt (especially Thunderbolt 3) and USB-C ports, their compatibility for displays and peripherals, cable requirements, and integration with USB4 standards on devices like MacBooks.

The cluster discusses companies sharing user data with data brokers and third parties like banks, Google, and Facebook, highlighting privacy concerns, lack of transparency, and calls for regulation.

The cluster focuses on debates about ethics in tech companies and startups, questioning whether they prioritize ethical behavior over profit, with frequent mentions of firms like Meta and Google engaging in unethical practices.

Comments primarily consist of users sharing links to rationalist websites like LessWrong and Slate Star Codex, Yudkowsky's essays, sci-fi novels such as Snow Crash, and other philosophical or futuristic writings.

Discussions center on AI-powered tools, chat services, and APIs providing medical advice, consultations, and healthcare support as alternatives to traditional doctors, with mixes of enthusiasm, skepticism, and comparisons to real medical professionals.

Discussions center on using lists of common English words for secure passphrase generation, debating optimal wordlist sizes, vocabulary entropy, commonality rankings, and related tools.

This cluster centers on debates about the persistence of India's caste system, its influence on discrimination among Indian diaspora in US tech companies, and issues like affirmative action and cultural denial.

Discussions center on Khan Academy and similar platforms like MOOCs, Coursera, and Udacity, debating their role in disrupting traditional education, providing free high-quality content, adoption challenges, and business opportunities.

Discussions center on Facebook's Internet.org/Free Basics initiative providing free limited internet access (e.g., Facebook, Wikipedia) to poor people without any internet, debating if it's better than nothing or creates a walled garden.

Discussions center on horizontal scaling of SQL databases using distributed systems like CockroachDB, YugabyteDB, Citus, and Vitess, versus traditional Postgres limitations with sharding, replication, and consistency challenges.

Comments in this cluster focus on feedback requesting better README files for GitHub projects, including more descriptions, explanations, screenshots, and structure to make them more helpful and informative. Project authors often acknowledge the suggestions and commit to updating their READMEs.

Commenters primarily compare a new remote access or terminal tool to SSH, request SSH integration or support, and discuss web-based SSH clients and similar alternatives.

Comments recommend privacy-friendly, cookie-less, and self-hosted web analytics tools like Plausible, Matomo, Fathom, and Simple Analytics as alternatives to Google Analytics, highlighting GDPR compliance and data privacy benefits.

Debate on the merits, criticisms, and alternatives to whiteboard coding exercises in software engineering job interviews, highlighting issues like stress, irrelevance to real work, and their value for assessing problem-solving and communication skills.

This cluster focuses on users asking about Google Cloud Platform (GCP) equivalents, integrations, support, or availability for the main post's technology or service, often expressing curiosity or hope for upcoming features. Discussions highlight comparisons, existing GCP capabilities, and occasional criticisms of GCP's offerings.

Comments focus on the fear of expressing unpopular opinions publicly due to risks like job loss, cancellation, or social backlash, resulting in self-censorship and stifled discourse.

Discussions focus on web libraries like PJAX, Turbolinks, and similar tools that enable faster, SPA-like navigation in server-rendered multi-page apps by replacing page content without full browser reloads, often comparing them to traditional reloads and full SPAs.

Discussions focus on software-defined radio (SDR) devices like RTL-SDR, HackRF, LimeSDR, and BladeRF, including recommendations, use cases, getting started resources, and hardware setups for radio signal processing and experimentation.

This cluster features comments repeatedly emphasizing that personal tastes, preferences, and opinions vary widely among individuals, often defending subjective likes against criticism in discussions about products, styles, or activities.

The cluster centers on concerns about vehicle crash safety, particularly the lack or role of crumple zones in absorbing impacts, with comparisons to rigid structures like walls and debates on modern car designs.

The cluster focuses on discussions about different RAM generations (DDR3, DDR4, DDR5, LPDDR5), their speeds, bandwidth, capacities, memory channels, soldered vs. upgradable configurations, and compatibility with CPUs and motherboards.

The cluster centers on debates about what defines a 'senior developer' or 'senior engineer', including metrics like years of experience, leadership, decision-making, scope of responsibility, and how the term varies across companies.

Commenters criticize a company's handling of an announcement for a major change, debating the lack of prior internal warnings to employees and maintainers versus waiting for a planned event, and questioning why more notice wasn't given despite rumors.

Discussions focus on the rarity, distribution, measurement, and relevance of IQ scores, particularly among Hacker News users, tech professionals, and claims of high intelligence.

The cluster focuses on common issues with malloc in C programming, including failure to check NULL returns, memory overcommit on Linux, uninitialized memory risks, and alternatives like Guard Malloc or calloc.

The cluster focuses on criticism of AI regulation efforts, viewing them as regulatory capture by companies like OpenAI to suppress open-source competitors and innovation rather than addressing real risks.

The cluster centers on challenges in voting systems including gaming, rigging, unlimited votes, and manipulation, with discussions of solutions like quadratic voting, karma costs, and vote limits.

The cluster centers on discussions of supply chain attacks in package managers like npm, crates.io, and PyPI, highlighting risks from untrusted third-party dependencies, malicious updates, and the need for auditing tools.

Discussions focus on issues with hardware connectors such as poor robustness, insecure connections, orientation problems, proprietary standards, and design shortcomings, often comparing to alternatives like Apple's and suggesting improvements.

Users and moderators repeatedly enforce Hacker News guidelines by urging submission of original sources over secondary articles reporting on them, often linking to prior discussions and moving comments accordingly.

The cluster discusses how social media platforms like Facebook, Twitter, Google, and Reddit pose significant risks to democracy by controlling information flow, spreading propaganda, censoring content, and influencing elections.

Discussions center on the physics of black holes, including observer-dependent views of objects crossing the event horizon, Hawking radiation, singularities, and tidal forces.

Comments critique Google's transformation from an ambitious innovator to a bureaucratic, profit-driven corporation focused on ads, short-term gains, and market defense rather than groundbreaking '0 to 1' innovation.

Debate on whether compensation or wealth accurately measures the value individuals create for society, challenging assumptions with examples like CEOs, nurses, and economic theories.

This cluster focuses on discussions about deepfake technology, its ability to create indistinguishable fake videos and audio, and the resulting challenges to trust in media, calls for detection methods, and potential societal disruptions.

Comments debate the true meaning and application of Minimum Viable Product (MVP) in startups, criticizing inadequate implementations as mere experiments while advocating for quick launches to validate ideas.

The cluster focuses on discussions about AWS IAM's security features, best practices like using roles and short-lived credentials instead of root keys, potential vulnerabilities, and debates on its complexity and effectiveness.

Commenters compare Google to the old Microsoft, noting similarities in business practices, bureaucracy, market dominance, and loss of innovation, while some observe Microsoft adopting Google-like traits. Discussions highlight Google's shift towards monopolistic behaviors reminiscent of Microsoft's past.

Cluster centers on debates comparing Eclipse and IntelliJ IDEA as Java IDEs, with most comments recommending IntelliJ for its superior usability, performance, and features over the bloated Eclipse.

The cluster centers on debates about whether the 2020 US presidential election was stolen or fraudulent, including claims of rigging, lack of evidence, historical comparisons to Democratic challenges in past elections, and accusations of both-sidesism.

Discussions center on tools, scripts, and methods like O&O ShutUp10, Windows10Debloater, and w10privacy to remove pre-installed bloatware, adware, spyware, telemetry, and unwanted features from Windows 10/11 for better privacy and performance.

Commenters express frustration over various processes being excessively time-consuming, laborious, effortful, and often frustrating or not worth the hassle.

Comments discuss the likelihood of a policy, ruling, or law being challenged, blocked, or overturned in court, with heavy focus on potential Supreme Court involvement and outcomes.

Comments focus on high divorce rates, their financial and emotional impacts compared to other risks like unemployment, criticisms of divorce laws, and statistics on marriage dissolution.

Users propose and discuss creating websites, wikis, or communities to collect, share, and aggregate startup and side project ideas from Hacker News threads and similar sources.

The cluster focuses on debates comparing Bitcoin to gold as a store of value or 'digital gold,' highlighting its deflationary properties, superiority over fiat currencies for long-term savings, and criticisms likening it to tulips or questioning its stability.

The cluster focuses on criticisms of the UK government, particularly the Conservative Party (Tories), British political attitudes, and perceived declines in the UK's governance and society.

Users complain about a website or tool's scrolling being poor with mouse scroll wheels, smoother on trackpads and touch surfaces like Magic Mouse, with debates on acceleration, natural direction, and OS differences especially on Mac.

The cluster focuses on discussions about the dangers of asteroid strikes on Earth, probabilities of impacts, deflection and mitigation strategies like nuclear blasts, and concerns over weaponizing asteroids.

Discussions center on Google's alleged anti-competitive behaviors, including references to EU fines, US lawsuits, Android defaults, and search dominance to stifle competition.

This cluster debates whether modern programmers need deep knowledge of low-level concepts like assembly, C, CPU architecture, and hardware fundamentals, or if high-level abstractions are sufficient for effective software development.

The cluster discusses funding mechanisms for open source projects, including donations, foundations like FSF and Linux Foundation, corporate sponsorships, and calls for more support to sustain OSS development.

The cluster revolves around discussions clarifying that institutional investors like pension funds, index funds, Vanguard, and BlackRock hold shares on behalf of individual retail investors, endowments, and public savings rather than as their own proprietary assets.

The cluster focuses on discussions about Linux kernel versions in distributions like Ubuntu and SLES, including LTS support, the need for recent kernels to address vulnerabilities and hardware compatibility, and challenges with updates and patches.

Comments centered on the 'number go up' meme, debating or celebrating rapid increases in metrics like prices, upvotes, performance scores, sales, or counts referenced in the article or post.

The cluster debates the revolutionary nature, historical context, and economic benefits of reusable rockets, focusing heavily on SpaceX's Falcon 9 and Starship achievements versus past efforts like the Space Shuttle.

The cluster discusses the lack of ethical responsibility among software engineers, calls for a professional code of ethics similar to other fields like medicine or civil engineering, and debates issues like privacy breaches, surveillance tech, and societal impacts.

Comments expressing surprise, emphasis, or discussion on the unexpectedly large size, scale, or magnitude of various objects, technologies, AI models, aircraft, databases, and other phenomena in Hacker News threads.

The cluster focuses on discussions about how electricity flows, critiquing and explaining analogies like water pipes for electric current, electron movement, and related electromagnetic concepts.

Comments debate the dangers of lacking an exit strategy in startups or investments, emphasizing risks of total loss, opportunity costs like leaving money on the table, and the perils of having nothing to lose.

The cluster debates the economic feasibility of asteroid mining, questioning if it's cheaper than Earth mining for terrestrial use or more valuable for in-space manufacturing, construction, and avoiding Earth's gravity well.

The cluster primarily consists of repeated postings of George Bernard Shaw's quote stating that progress depends on the 'unreasonable man' who seeks to adapt the world to himself rather than adapting to it. Sample comments include related philosophical quotes on human nature, progress, and innovation.

Commenters debate building logic gates, adders, flip-flops, and minimalist CPUs using unconventional or discrete components like soil pots, resistors, NAND gates, or novel mediums, often referencing Ben Eater-style designs and gate efficiency.

This cluster centers on critiques of consumerism and overconsumption, debating its role in society, economy, and environment, with discussions on whether it can be reduced or is essential for growth.

The cluster discusses the practical limitations, legal dependencies, and misconceptions around smart contracts, including their reliance on traditional law, vulnerability to bugs, and the 'code is law' fallacy.

The cluster focuses on debates over specific police actions in a reported incident, broader criticisms of US law enforcement brutality and impunity, and arguments about whether such topics are appropriate for Hacker News.

The cluster discusses the severe lack of price transparency in US healthcare, where hospitals and providers refuse or cannot disclose costs upfront, preventing patients from shopping around, comparing prices, or predicting bills due to opaque billing practices and insurance negotiations.

The cluster centers on discussions about the rule of law, questioning whether government actions, authorities, or political figures are upholding it or eroding it through arbitrary power, rule by law, or favoritism.

This cluster debates the philosophical distinction between objective reality and subjective perceptions, questioning how individuals conceptualize and access true reality amid illusions, biases, and differing worldviews.

Comments discuss how personal networks and connections are crucial for career success, job opportunities, and professional advancement, often more than individual knowledge or skills.

Users repeatedly demand citations, sources, or references to back up claims in comments and articles, criticizing unsubstantiated assertions and emphasizing evidence-based discussion.

This cluster centers on debates about the social contract, where participating in society requires accepting collective rules and limitations on personal freedoms in exchange for benefits, with discussions on opting out or refusing compliance.

The cluster focuses on criticisms and debates about AWS S3, including public bucket misconfigurations, data loss concerns, compatibility problems, and reliability compared to alternatives.

This cluster revolves around heated discussions on Islamophobia, criticisms of Muslim integration, crime rates, welfare dependency, and links to extremism versus defenses of moderate Muslims and accusations of bigotry.

The cluster focuses on debates and advice about negotiating salary during job offers, including strategies like having competing offers, avoiding revealing current salary, power imbalances between employers and employees, and the importance of being willing to walk away.

Debates on whether platforms like YouTube should ban or censor disturbing videos of violence such as beheadings, massacres, murders, and ethnic cleansing, balancing user protection and trauma prevention against free speech.

The cluster centers on debates about gift cards versus cash or other gifts, highlighting drawbacks like expiration, limited usability, tax implications, and preferences for fungible money or thoughtful alternatives.

Debates using seatbelts as an analogy for mandatory safety measures like masks, discussing benefits, rare harms, personal freedom, and why such precautions are enforced despite inconveniences.

Cluster focuses on debates about the police shooting of Ashli Babbitt during the January 6 Capitol riot, including whether it was justified, if she was armed or attacking, and details from videos and reports.

Cluster focuses on debates around best practices for managing and updating software dependencies, including risks of breaking changes, security vulnerabilities, pinning versions, periodic reviews, and tools like Dependabot.

The cluster centers on debates about Google's firing of engineer James Damore for his internal memo critiquing diversity policies and citing gender differences in interests, often comparing it to cases like Timnit Gebru's departure and discussing free speech in the workplace.

This cluster centers on debates about Bitcoin mining's high energy use, whether it constitutes waste, its environmental impact like CO2 emissions, and counterarguments that it incentivizes renewables or provides value.

The cluster discusses the subjectivity of taste in food, including debates on natural vs. processed ingredients, the role of expectation and culture in perception, and contrasts with nutrition or health benefits.

Discussions center on the successes, challenges, and viability of indie game development, including examples of hits like Valheim and Stardew Valley, high failure rates, market saturation, and calls to support indie devs over AAA titles.

Comments primarily compare a new workflow orchestration tool to established alternatives like Airflow, Temporal, Prefect, Dagster, and others, questioning differences, advantages, and suitability for various use cases.

The cluster focuses on discussions about the roles, power dynamics, and conflicts between CEOs and boards of directors, including board oversight of CEOs, shareholder representation, and governance decisions in companies like OpenAI.

The cluster focuses on Elon Musk's $44 billion acquisition of Twitter, its subsequent devaluation (now worth about a third), associated debt, and debates on whether it was a good deal or lost opportunity, with speculations about reselling or other buyers.

The cluster focuses on debates about whether AI models' behaviors or benchmark performances stem from genuine learning or memorization due to test questions or related content leaking into training data. Commenters question proofs of data absence in training sets and risks of overfitting or contamination.