All Topics

The cluster centers on debates about the effectiveness of protests, particularly whether they need to be disruptive, inconvenient, or clearly communicative to have impact, with many comments critiquing a specific protest's clarity and results.

Commenters express deep suspicion that the linked article or announcement hides a catch, trick, scam, or ulterior motive, often noting it seems too good to be true or more than meets the eye.

Commenters draw parallels between the article's topic and cars, often noting that cars already have similar features, lack them, or speculating on their application to automobiles.

This cluster centers on discussions advocating for SSDs, emphasizing their superior performance over HDDs, urging upgrades, and debating their impact on system speed and reliability.

Discussions center on no-code and low-code tools for building websites, web apps, and UI components, frequently referencing Webflow alternatives with features like drag-and-drop editors, AI generation, and full-stack code output for rapid prototyping.

Discussions center on controversies around grading practices in university classes, particularly curving grades to adjust for low averages or cheating, fairness issues, grade inflation, and alternatives like pass/fail or separating teaching from grading.

This cluster centers on discussions about Trusted Platform Module (TPM) chips, their use in secure boot, remote attestation, and hardware security, debating whether they provide genuine user benefits or mainly enable DRM and vendor control. Related topics include software vs hardware TPMs, comparisons to TrustZone or SGX, and concerns over treacherous computing.

The cluster focuses on debates about conflicts between Amazon and book publishers over ebook pricing, sales strategies, piracy, and the declining relevance of traditional publishers in the digital book market.

Comments primarily ask for opinions on which option, alternative, or choice is better, preferable, or superior, often soliciting recommendations between two or more items.

This cluster revolves around discussions and critiques of capitalization usage in Hacker News comments, posts, titles, code, and writing styles, including preferences for lowercase, all caps, or standard conventions.

The cluster focuses on debates about Linux kernel development decisions, including the strict 'don't break userspace' compatibility policy, whether specific features or code belong in the kernel, and pushback from kernel developers.

This cluster revolves around comments that point out misunderstandings, misinterpretations, or misrepresentations of the parent comment in Hacker News threads, often questioning how a reply contradicts or relates to what the parent actually said.

This cluster consists of users asking for links, stores, vendors, or sources to purchase the product or item featured in the parent thread, with responses providing specific shopping links like AliExpress, Amazon, or manufacturer sites.

Commenters repeatedly note or confirm that the article's topic, feature, or phenomenon exists, is common, or applies in Australia, often contrasting it with the US.

Comments joking about, praising, or questioning the Hacker News community's frequent mentions and enthusiasm for the Lisp programming language, even in unrelated discussions.

The cluster centers on criticism of Boeing's safety record, quality issues, and competitive struggles against Airbus, with users frequently citing the meme 'If it’s Boeing, I ain’t going' and debating the duopoly in the aviation industry.

Parents discuss experiences with public school quality disparities between affluent and poor areas, options like moving districts, private schools, or school choice programs, and consequences like segregation.

Commenters repeatedly ask for practical use cases, applications, or real-world examples of the discussed technology, project, or device.

Discussions center on the significant difficulties in robotics for real-world tasks like manipulation and planning, emphasizing hardware limitations, simulation gaps, Moravec's Paradox, and contrasts with easier AI progress in software domains.

The cluster discusses the issues with US health insurance being tied to employment, such as job market friction, barriers to switching jobs or unemployment, and advocates for decoupling it like in other countries.

Discussions center on why credit cards are less common in Europe compared to the US, highlighting preferences for debit cards, local payment systems like iDEAL and Girocard, and regulatory or cultural factors limiting credit card adoption.

Discussions center on advocating for, personal experiences with, and company trials of the 4-day workweek, often highlighting maintained productivity without salary reductions.

Cluster focuses on debates about whether ChatGPT and GPT models possess true understanding, comprehension, or knowledge, or if they merely statistically predict responses from training data without genuine cognition.

This cluster focuses on reactions to a new or proposed programming language, with users expressing skepticism about the need for more languages, debating what constitutes a 'real' programming language, and sparking familiar flamewars.

Discussions center on whether global hunger stems from insufficient food production or distribution problems, with debates on starvation in capitalist societies and the ability to feed everyone.

This cluster centers on discussions of Nintendo's business practices, console hardware strategies, game development, IP management, and comparisons to other companies, often as counterpoints or examples in broader tech/gaming debates.

Discussions center on Intel's declining market position and strategic challenges against competitors like AMD, ARM, TSMC, and Nvidia, including the innovator's dilemma, loss of market share, and debates over focusing on high-margin products versus broader competition.

The cluster discusses how job interviews are a two-way street, where candidates evaluate the company's culture, interviewers, and processes just as companies assess candidates, often viewing poor interview practices as red flags signaling undesirable workplaces.

This cluster centers on debates about Apple's continued use of the Lightning connector versus switching to USB-C for iPhones and other devices, including historical context, user inconvenience from cable obsolescence, and pressures from regulations like EU mandates.

Comments criticize planned obsolescence in consumer electronics and other products, linking it to increased e-waste, poor repairability, and manufacturer practices that prioritize profits over longevity and sustainability.

The cluster centers on debates about the necessity and limitations of HTTPS for web security, especially in preventing man-in-the-middle attacks, ensuring page integrity, and criticisms of sites served over plain HTTP.

Comments focus on severance pay in employee terminations, debating conditions for receiving it (e.g., firing vs. quitting), attached clauses like NDAs, and company strategies to avoid payouts.

Users debate how fragmented streaming services like Netflix have made legal access inconvenient and expensive, leading many to prefer piracy for better UX, availability, and no regional restrictions.

This cluster revolves around sarcastic and skeptical discussions about the presence, participation, and representation of women specifically on Hacker News, often questioning their visibility or role in tech communities.

The cluster discusses the value, teaching methods, and necessity of calculus in high school and college curricula, often debating its relevance compared to statistics and practical applications in fields like physics and engineering.

This cluster centers on debates about whether there is a true shortage of skilled software developers, with discussions contrasting high demand for experienced talent against an oversupply of juniors, picky hiring, and compensation issues.

This cluster centers on arguments about whether it's justifiable to break laws, especially when compliance is difficult, inconvenient, or not enforced, with most commenters opposing such rationalizations and advocating strict adherence to the law.

The cluster centers on debates about societal attitudes toward recreational drug use, including comparisons to alcohol and tobacco, arguments for responsible use versus addiction risks, and judgments about drug users in professional contexts like tech.

Commenters share experiences and advice on how perceptions of time, priorities, career, family, and satisfaction shift across ages, particularly from 20s to 40s and beyond.

Users discuss frustrations with Amazon's handling of returns, Marketplace scams, account suspensions, and strict policies punishing legitimate customers, often urging complaints to Amazon for resolution.

The cluster centers on discussions of toxic masculinity as a social construct harming men through rigid gender roles, debates over its validity, societal pressures on men, and comparisons to women's issues or patriarchy.

The cluster centers on debates about the value, burdens, and trade-offs of maintaining backwards compatibility in programming languages, libraries, and software tools. Commenters discuss whether breaking it enables improvements or risks stability and user adoption.

The cluster focuses on discussions debating the definition, importance, presence, and application of empathy versus sympathy in social interactions, decision-making, and interpersonal conflicts.

Comments discuss the persistent problem of Android phones receiving delayed or no OS and security updates, blaming OEMs, carriers, and fragmentation while noting exceptions like Google Pixel devices.

The cluster centers on debates about Uber breaking or skirting taxi laws and regulations in various cities, its business model of disruption through non-compliance, and whether it should follow the same rules as traditional taxi services.

This cluster focuses on complaints about npm outages, installation problems, reliability issues, and suggestions for alternatives like pnpm or yarn in the Node.js ecosystem.

This cluster features developers and maintainers thanking users for reporting bugs or issues, apologizing when necessary, and committing to investigate or fix them.

Users recommend classical music pieces and composers like Bach, Mozart, and Beethoven, discuss performance challenges, public domain issues, and Bach's popularity on Hacker News in the context of a music recommendation tool.

This cluster captures arguments over precise wording, semantics, and misuse of 'language' in debates about a programming language, with commenters accusing each other of linguistic pedantry rather than substantive criticism.

Cluster consists of playful comments enthusiastically praising clever solutions, attitudes, or actions as embodying 'hacker spirit,' true hacking, or hacker-like behavior. Users repeatedly invoke phrases like 'that's hacker spirit' or 'what a hacker would do' in a light-hearted, complimentary manner.

Comments discuss advancements in C++ language standards from C++11 through C++23, including new features, compiler support, proposals, and what constitutes 'modern' C++.

The cluster focuses on criticisms of LeetCode-style coding interviews, arguing they test problem memorization rather than real software engineering skills, disrespect experienced candidates, and fail to identify talent suitable for actual job roles.

Discussions center on modern projects recreating or emulating classic 8-bit computers and CPUs like 6502/Z80, including Commander X16, Mega65, breadboard builds, and FPGA implementations.

Comments debate economic principles of comparative advantage, gains from trade, and arguments for free trade versus protectionism and mercantilism in international commerce.

Discussions focus on methods to block web trackers, including ad blockers like uBlock Origin, browser features such as Firefox's Enhanced Tracking Protection and Safari's protections, and tools like PiHole or Ghostery, with debates on their effectiveness against intrusive tracking and analytics.

The cluster focuses on widespread distrust in tech companies and third parties regarding user data privacy, anonymization, and potential abuses, with debates on whether to trust software providers or services like Mozilla and Stripe.

The cluster focuses on recommendations for noise-cancelling, isolating, or over-ear headphones (including ANC and IEMs) as solutions to block ambient noise in noisy environments like offices, allowing safer music listening or focus without earplugs.

The cluster centers on discussions of the halting problem in computer science, including its undecidability, relations to specific programs or proofs, and claims about solving it.

Users discuss AMD CPUs, particularly Ryzen, inquiring about their support, compatibility, safety from vulnerabilities, and availability as options compared to Intel in products or issues.

Discussions question the relevance, assumptions, and implications of inferring or using gender from names in software tools or services, often criticizing binary gender options and advocating for neutrality.

Comments advocate redesigning cities to prioritize pedestrians, cyclists, and public transport over cars, criticizing car-centric planning and proposing measures like narrower streets, superblocks, and car bans in city centers.

Users repeatedly question the destination and use of large sums of money, often implying government spending, stimulus funds, or public money ending up in pockets rather than intended purposes, with skepticism about waste or misallocation.

Comments debate whether safety in AI development is binary or a spectrum, genuinely prioritized over progress, or used as a pretext for other motivations.

Discussions center on incidents with autonomous vehicles like Tesla FSD, debating whether driver interventions, disengagements, or near-misses qualify as actual crashes and who bears responsibility.

This cluster centers on the 'Falsehoods Programmers Believe About Phone Numbers' article, discussing misconceptions like phone numbers not being unique, globally fixed, or permanently owned, including portability, recycling, and international variations.

The cluster debates whether LLMs can generate novel knowledge and generalize beyond their training data or if they merely regurgitate, approximate, or statistically predict based on existing training material.

Comments criticize the academic publishing industry, particularly publishers like Elsevier, for profiting immensely from publicly funded research, free peer review, and author labor while charging high publication and access fees.

Discussions contrast small businesses and startups with large corporations, highlighting differences in resources, luxuries, capabilities, and how certain practices or issues affect them disproportionately.

Commenters highlight gold's practical utility, stability as a store of value, and suggest it as a superior alternative to whatever asset or technology is discussed in the parent post, often with sarcasm or advice to buy gold instead.

Users consistently complain about the discussed tool, website, or application being painfully slow, sluggish, and often unusable due to poor performance.

Users repeatedly request salary ranges, total compensation details, and breakdowns in Hacker News job postings, criticizing omissions and praising inclusions.

Discussions debate the causes of aviation accidents, focusing on pilot error versus aircraft system failures like MCAS, fly-by-wire modes, stalls, and inadequate training or manuals in incidents such as Air France 447 and Boeing 737 events.

Discussions center on common misconceptions, proper usage, and limitations of Big O notation in algorithm analysis, emphasizing its asymptotic nature over practical performance details like constants and small inputs.

This cluster centers on debates about the effectiveness of face masks in preventing COVID-19 transmission, focusing on whether they primarily protect the wearer or others from asymptomatic spread.

This cluster focuses on Tesla vehicles' quality problems, reliability concerns, and repair challenges, including long service times, parts shortages, build defects, and difficulties at non-Tesla shops. Users share anecdotes, cite studies like J.D. Power and Consumer Reports, and debate Tesla's service model versus traditional automakers.

Comments debate whether humans are uniquely intelligent, conscious, or sentient compared to other animals, challenging anthropocentric views and highlighting animal sentience, emotions, and cognition in species like mammals, birds, and octopuses.

Users debate and compare apartment and housing rental costs across cities, highlighting high prices in tech hubs like San Francisco, LA, and Seattle versus cheaper areas in the US, Europe, and Midwest.

Discussions center on whether a specific acquisition was an acquihire to obtain talent rather than the product or business, with many comments speculating it fits this pattern.

Discussions center on the value, delivery, and reception of feedback, particularly constructive feedback for products, startups, and professional performance, debating when it's useful, ignored, or unwanted.

Comments debate China's technological capabilities and innovation compared to the US and Silicon Valley, discussing IP theft, government investments, leadership in hardware like chips and EVs, and whether China is catching up or surpassing Western tech.

Commenters challenge each other's claims as wrong or incorrect, often demanding specific explanations or evidence for alleged factual errors.

Cluster focuses on frustrations with unsolicited, automated, and irrelevant emails from recruiters, including poor job matches, spammy practices, and advice on handling them.

Comments focus on remarkable old or giant trees, their growth and survival in urban areas despite threats like vandalism and human interference, and ideas for planting resilient species like CRISPR-modified hardwoods.

The cluster focuses on criticisms of tech companies for not truly caring about, listening to, or respecting their users' needs and preferences, often portraying users as the product rather than the priority.

Cluster focuses on discussions of robotics frameworks like ROS alternatives, hardware kits, robot arms, and getting started projects, with users sharing links to products, videos, and recommendations.

This cluster centers on humorous dog-related puns, jokes, references to dog lovers, and requests for dog-themed versions of a product or feature, including nods to Datadog and dogfooding in a tech context.

The cluster centers on personal experiences with remote work, debating its benefits like saved commute time, productivity, and family flexibility against drawbacks such as social isolation, loneliness, and reduced in-person interactions.

The cluster discusses criticisms of internet-connected smart home appliances like thermostats, fridges, and washers, focusing on security risks, privacy concerns, unnecessary cloud dependency, and the growing difficulty of finding non-smart alternatives.

Users share experiences, apps like Truecaller and Nomorobo, and strategies such as whitelisting contacts or blocking area codes to combat robocalls and spam phone calls.

This cluster discusses the prevalence of sexism, gender bias, and underrepresentation of women in the tech industry, including debates on whether these issues exist and their impact on women in tech.

Cluster centers on comparisons between Vue.js and React, with users explaining preferences for Vue due to its simplicity, intuitive API, lower learning curve, and higher productivity over React's complexity.

Discussions focus on comparing COVID-19 infection, hospitalization, and death rates between vaccinated and unvaccinated populations, including debates over statistical interpretations, population adjustments, and requests for data sources.

Discussions revolve around the purpose, timing, value, and challenges of software developers pursuing side projects outside their day jobs, debating if they should be hobbies, career boosters, or skipped for work-life balance.

Comments debate the benefits of auto-formatters like gofmt, Prettier, and Black for enforcing consistent code styles, reducing formatting disputes, and improving team collaboration via standards and CI integration.

Discussions focus on complaints about macOS stagnation, UI degradation, feature removals, and Apple's prioritization of iOS over improving macOS usability and developer experience.

The cluster debates Java's ongoing popularity and usage in major tech companies, enterprises, and large-scale projects, countering perceptions of it being outdated or legacy-only while highlighting its ecosystem, tooling, and developer availability.

This cluster debates the justification of high CEO salaries compared to employee pay, questioning if CEOs provide value proportional to their compensation packages and often contrasting them with engineers or average workers.

Comments focus on NSA and CIA surveillance, backdoors, spyware implants, and ironic concerns about government spying enabled by security vulnerabilities or tools.

Discussions center on the limitations of trees for long-term carbon capture, as they release CO2 upon death and decomposition, with proposals to cut, bury, or durably use wood to achieve permanent sequestration.

Discussions criticize HTML, CSS, and JavaScript as inadequate for building complex web applications, arguing they were designed for documents rather than dynamic apps, and call for new approaches or native alternatives.