All Topics

Users discuss and recommend RSS feed readers like Feedly, NewsBlur, Inoreader, and self-hosted options as replacements for the discontinued Google Reader.

Comments in this cluster focus on requests, acknowledgments, and discussions about updating or correcting Hacker News submission titles to improve clarity, accuracy, or descriptiveness.

Users repeatedly inquire about the availability, plans, and access to an API for the featured product or service, with responses noting it's in open beta or not yet public.

This cluster centers on debates about the H1B visa program in tech, including its use for hiring, worker exploitation, legal requirements, and impacts on US employment.

Users express solidarity by stating they are in the same situation, facing the same problem, or sharing the same feelings as the original post or other commenters.

The cluster centers on debates about the reality, proper diagnosis, and treatment of ADHD, including personal stories of adult diagnoses, skepticism over overdiagnosis, medication effects, and misconceptions.

Users repeatedly inquire about the availability of source code on GitHub for featured projects, often noting missing links, empty repos, or requesting it be uploaded.

The cluster debates the validity of technical interviews that require implementing algorithms from memory, criticizing it as poor assessment of real-world skills and advocating for problem-solving, real problems, or allowing googling instead.

Commenters attribute the discussed issue or action to Microsoft's characteristic practices, often sarcastically noting that it's exactly what one would expect from the company. The cluster revolves around dismissing surprises or criticisms by invoking 'it's Microsoft' as an explanation.

Commenters express widespread distrust and criticism of Amazon's intentions, arguing that the company prioritizes its own interests over users or the public and would likely oppose or exploit any competing efforts.

Comments repeatedly urging or mocking users for not reading the linked article, post, or comments carefully before responding, often referencing poor reading comprehension or skimming.

Users express frustration with AI language models like ChatGPT for mimicking human conversation, expressing opinions, role-playing, and being overly agreeable or patronizing, preferring direct and impersonal tool-like interactions instead.

Comments debate the existence, behaviors, and negative impacts of monopolies in markets, contrasting them with competitive dynamics and highlighting risks like reduced choice and stifled innovation.

The cluster focuses on discussions about technical debt in software development, including its definition, metaphors like financial debt, benefits and risks, management strategies, and distinctions from incompetence or messes.

Comments in this cluster debate the value, relevance, productivity, and appropriateness of discussions occurring in Hacker News threads, often defending or questioning their worthiness.

This cluster centers on discussions questioning the drawbacks, benefits, and alternatives to async/await syntax in programming languages, including comparisons to callbacks, generators, goroutines, and implementations in JS, Python, Go, and others.

Commenters discuss comparisons between the announced tool or feature and GitLab, often noting that GitLab already offers similar functionality or requesting GitLab support and integration.

The cluster focuses on debates about compiler optimization capabilities, including how much compilers can optimize code versus humans, specific optimization techniques, levels, and comparisons across languages.

Users share links to their own side projects, open-source tools, and GitHub repositories, often seeking feedback, noting similarities to the main post, or promoting their work on Hacker News.

Comments speculate on Vladimir Putin's motivations, strategies, and criticisms, especially regarding Russia's invasion of Ukraine, ambitions to revive the USSR, and related geopolitical tensions.

Comments in this cluster humorously or sarcastically highlight money as the central motivation, incentive, or deciding factor in decisions, often questioning 'where's the money' or prioritizing it over impact.

This cluster discusses the common practice of reusing passwords across services, its associated security risks like credential stuffing, and solutions such as password managers or unique passwords per site.

This cluster centers on discussions about net neutrality, including its potential violations by ISPs, effects of its repeal, arguments for and against, and related policy implications.

Discussions revolve around React.js, its popularity, comparisons to alternatives, and suggestions to use it over other frameworks or vanilla JS in various projects.

Users debate Dropbox's file synchronization capabilities and recommend open-source replacements like Syncthing and rsync for cross-device syncing.

Discussions revolve around the proper role of computers as tools for computation and data processing, versus human capabilities for advice, social interaction, and other non-computational tasks, often with sarcasm about anthropomorphizing machines or questioning their use.

Comments sarcastically or pessimistically respond to optimistic claims about something happening 'soon,' emphasizing long wait times or that it's only a matter of time before prolonged delays continue.

Comments discuss the risks and implications of surveillance technologies, including government overreach, privacy erosion, and the balance between security benefits and potential abuse.

Commenters highlight the irony and issues of the discussed website lacking HTTPS support, noting browser warnings, HSTS, and conflicts with extensions like HTTPS Everywhere that force HTTPS and break HTTP-only features.

The cluster revolves around debates questioning whether certain criticized individuals or behaviors truly represent 'real' engineers, often invoking the 'no true engineer' or 'no true Scotsman' fallacy. Discussions defend or gatekeep engineer identity in response to broader criticisms of engineering practices or competence.

This cluster centers on discussions about the feasibility, benefits, limitations, and distinctions between true anonymity and pseudonymity online, including challenges in achieving untraceability and its implications for privacy and accountability.

Discussions focus on incidents and scenarios where autonomous vehicles like Tesla Autopilot, Waymo, and others fail to detect or properly respond to obstacles, barriers, pedestrians, or unexpected road situations, debating their safety, braking behavior, and reliability compared to human drivers.

This cluster features repetitive positive comments praising the quality of a shared article and thanking the poster for sharing it.

Users discuss, criticize, defend, and suggest alternatives for the name of a specific software project or product featured on Hacker News.

The cluster focuses on debates about GPL license requirements, such as distributing source code for derivatives, violations when combining with closed-source code, and obligations for users and distributors.

Users share links to and recommend various YouTube channels and videos relevant to the discussion topic, with core comments being direct promotions of specific channels.

Discussions center on whether a college degree is required for success in tech jobs, with many anecdotes of thriving without one contrasted against its role as a resume filter and signal of perseverance.

The cluster discusses the decline in usability and discoverability of modern user interfaces compared to the intuitive, learnable designs of the 80s and 90s, criticizing trends like flattening, hamburger menus, hidden features, and gesture-based interactions.

Commenters in this cluster repeatedly demand verifiable sources, citations, or evidence to support claims made in articles or other comments, criticizing unsubstantiated statements.

The cluster centers on debates about various sorting algorithms like quicksort, radix sort, bitonic sort, insertion sort, and others, comparing their speed, memory usage, stability, and suitability for different scenarios.

Discussions recommend and share experiences using MIT's Scratch visual programming tool to teach programming concepts to young children (ages 5-12), including its effectiveness, fun factor, alternatives like Hedy or Replit, and progression to text-based coding.

This cluster centers on debates about inflated housing prices driven by low interest rates, predictions of price corrections as rates rise, and factors like supply shortages, demand, and affordability.

The cluster focuses on discussions about services requiring credit cards, including frustrations with US-only credit cards, alternatives like prepaid or debit cards, and features like automatic billing updates on existing cards.

The cluster revolves around debates on the importance, necessity, and limitations of memory safety in programming languages like Rust versus C++, particularly in preventing security vulnerabilities.

Discussions focus on the pricing of a product or service, including concerns about high costs, value relative to price, varying price points, and pricing strategies.

Discussions revolve around comparisons between traditional hotels and platforms like Booking.com and Airbnb, questioning why hotels don't adopt similar pricing or booking innovations, and sharing advice on direct booking to avoid platform fees and issues.

The cluster revolves around skepticism toward blockchain technology's practical applications, with commenters debating whether it solves real problems or remains hype without proven uses beyond cryptocurrency and scams.

The cluster focuses on debates about Telegram's end-to-end encryption status, privacy features, and security compared to apps like Signal, with many arguing it lacks default E2EE and is unsuitable for private communications.

Comments primarily calling out Hacker News submissions that serve as wrappers or promotions for Amazon affiliate links, often highlighting the spammy nature or irony of such posts.

Commenters discuss and debate whether described symptoms or effects are from COVID infection or vaccination, frequently urging vaccination or questioning vaccine relevance and efficacy.

This cluster features users speculating and guessing the identity of an unnamed or vaguely described person from the parent comment or story, suggesting tech figures like Joel Spolsky, Joe Rogan, and Sam Bankman-Fried alongside celebrities.

The cluster focuses on the rivalry between AMD and Intel in the CPU market, debating AMD's gains, Intel's setbacks, and why consumers should choose one over the other.

Comments from authors introducing their projects, articles, or first-time posts on Hacker News and seeking feedback, along with encouragements for others to submit content like Show HN or Tell HN.

Debates on whether to directly answer questions or respond with counter-questions, frustrations with indirect or dismissive responses, and the value of asking questions over spouting answers in online discussions.

Comments from developers and project authors positively acknowledging user suggestions for new features or improvements, often adding them to roadmaps, todo lists, or committing to implementation.

Comments focus on Firefox's falling market share, comparisons to Chrome's dominance, Mozilla's strategic choices like activism over product improvement, compatibility issues, and urgent calls for users to support Firefox to prevent a Chrome monopoly.

Discussions center on corporate layoffs, distinguishing them from firings, company motivations for mass terminations, communication strategies, employee impacts, and whether they target underperformers or are business necessities.

This cluster consists of comments where users politely acknowledge a responder's point but clarify that it misses or is unrelated to their original argument.

Comments focus on Apple's iMessage being limited to iOS/iPhone users, its strong network effects, fallback to SMS for non-Apple devices, and debates over regulatory exemptions and potential Android interoperability.

This cluster features developers sharing their locations, remote preferences, technology stacks (e.g., Rust, C/C++, Python), resumes, and contact details in Hacker News 'Who Wants To Work' threads.

Users discuss issues with payment gateways like Paymill and PayPal, suggest alternatives such as Braintree, MercadoPago, and crypto options, and request additional payment methods for better accessibility.

Commenters discuss the suitability of SVG for a graphics demo or tool, debating its capabilities, limitations, performance, and alternatives like Canvas.

Discussions revolve around whether complexity in software is inevitable, beneficial, or avoidable, and how it shifts between layers, abstractions, and ecosystems rather than being eliminated.

The cluster focuses on the polarized opinions about Bitcoin within the Hacker News community, including complaints about downvoting, bias against pro-Bitcoin views, and defenses against anti-Bitcoin narratives.

Discussions compare Tailscale, which builds on WireGuard for convenience and management, to plain WireGuard setups, debating benefits like ease of use versus full control and performance.

Users complain about Twitter requiring login to view threads and tweets, frequent loading errors, and suggest workarounds like nitter or screenshots for better HN discussion.

Discussions center on whether code is 'bad' or acceptable, the ubiquity of imperfect code in production, and debates over standards for good code versus functional code.

Commenters intensely debate whether a specific action or scenario described in the article constitutes fraud, repeatedly questioning its legality and fraudulent elements.

Comments focus on banks freezing accounts, debiting money without permission, or failing to prevent fraud due to false-positive detections, poor security, and inadequate verification protocols.

The cluster discusses controversy around an article perceived as sexist, particularly critiquing gender-specific programs or distinctions, leading to debates on misogyny, gender wars, and Hacker News community standards.

The cluster centers on debates about whether to use programming frameworks, opt for libraries instead, or write code without them, weighing benefits like standardization against drawbacks like overhead and learning curves.

Users express confusion about the original post, article, or comment and repeatedly ask for explanations, simplifications, or elaborations.

Discussions focus on Claude Code's effectiveness for coding tasks, user experiences, comparisons to tools like Cursor, Copilot, and Aider, and debates on its quality versus prompt engineering issues.

Users repeatedly request, inquire about, and discuss the addition of keyboard shortcuts to a featured application or tool, emphasizing their need for efficient mouse-free navigation and interaction.

This cluster discusses AI tools for generating images from text prompts, such as DALL-E, Stable Diffusion, Midjourney, and open-source alternatives, including comparisons, user prompts, and performance experiences.

Comments liken the post's content or wording to absurd or funny elements from comedy sources like Douglas Adams, Monty Python, Seinfeld, Pulp Fiction, and other TV/movies.

Users criticize each other's comments for being shallow, dismissive, condescending, trite, or lacking substance, often urging elaboration or more constructive discussion on Hacker News.

The cluster focuses on comparisons of the Apple M1 processor's performance, efficiency, and benchmarks against Intel, AMD, and other CPUs, often highlighting M1's superiority in single-threaded speed, power efficiency, and real-world usage.

The cluster centers on arguments about the role, validity, and applicability of mathematics, with commenters often sarcastically defending math against dismissals or claims that downplay its importance.

The cluster focuses on recommendations to use password managers for generating and storing unique, strong passwords across services, with discussions on tools like 1Password, Bitwarden, and KeePass, as well as concerns about reliability and alternatives.

Discussions center on data centers, including their construction, locations, power requirements, energy sources, and environmental implications like heat production and water usage.

This cluster consists of comments where users express strong interest in reading blog posts about the discussed topic, frequently asking the original poster or commenters to write or share one.

Discussions focus on pervasive skepticism and criticism of Google in Hacker News threads, including accusations of hypocrisy, downvoting of pro-Google comments, and defenses against excessive Google bashing.

Discussions center on whether a specific remark was intended as a joke, defenses against those who take it seriously or downvote it, and debates over the acceptability and tastefulness of such humor in Hacker News comments.

The cluster centers on discussions about using WebSockets for real-time web communication, frequently comparing them to alternatives like Server-Sent Events (SSE), debating their advantages, limitations, and suitability in different scenarios.

This cluster consists of comments comparing the main article's subject, figure, or events to Donald Trump or his style, presidency, or actions, often questioning the relevance of such references.

The cluster centers on debates comparing garbage collection (GC) in languages like Go with non-GC alternatives like Rust, emphasizing Rust's memory safety without GC pauses and trade-offs in performance and complexity.

This cluster captures comments where users express sadness, condolences, disappointment, and sympathy in response to an unfortunate event, personal loss, or disappointing situation discussed in the thread.

This cluster consists of comments repeatedly referencing Tesla vehicles, their features like creep mode and autopilot, and drawing comparisons or jokes relating the article's topic to Tesla cars or owners.

Users question whether other commenters are genuine humans or AI bots, using sarcastic probes like 'asking for a friend,' 'normal human,' or 'mind reader.'

This cluster features comments from project authors thanking users for feedback, acknowledging suggestions for improvements like UI tweaks, and inviting more input or GitHub issues.

This cluster debates whether open source maintainers owe free support, updates, or compensation to users, emphasizing that OSS is a voluntary contribution or hobby rather than an entitlement or job.

The cluster centers on debates about the safety of self-driving cars suddenly braking for road hazards like pedestrians or debris, including risks of rear-end collisions, the need for defensive driving by human drivers, and arguments over speeds, following distances, and reaction strategies.

Cluster discusses the safety and security of C programming language, focusing on memory vulnerabilities, CVEs, ongoing bugs, and debates over whether C is suitable for modern software or should be replaced by safer alternatives like Rust.

Discussions evaluate the capabilities of LLMs like ChatGPT, Claude, and GPT-4 for generating, debugging, and understanding code, including prompting techniques, tools, and limitations.

Commenters frequently compare the article's subject—likely a company's practices or decisions—to Apple's strategies, noting similarities in opinionated design, ecosystem control, or business moves, often with speculation on whether Apple gets away with it.

Users repeatedly report that a specific app, tool, or feature does not work on iPad devices, expressing disappointment and requesting iPad compatibility or versions.

The cluster revolves around the popular 'XML is like violence—if it doesn't solve your problem, you're not using enough of it' joke, with debates on XML's usability, advantages like XPath, drawbacks such as complexity and XSLT, and its ongoing relevance.

The cluster discusses 'vibe coding,' a humorous or criticized approach to programming involving intuitive, AI-assisted code generation without deep understanding, contrasted with traditional emphases on writing and understanding code oneself, featuring quotes like 'Talk is cheap, show me the code.'

The cluster discusses whether a specific Twitter-related technique or tool violates Twitter's Terms of Service, often warning about risks of account suspensions, bans, or enforcement actions by Twitter.