All Topics

This cluster features enthusiastic, motivational comments urging people to take action, build projects, ship ideas, or move forward, often with phrases like 'Let's do it!', 'Go for it!', or 'Ship it!'

Comments focus on challenging claims by demanding links to scientific studies, questioning their existence, relevance, or proper interpretation, and distinguishing anecdotes from evidence.

The cluster focuses on debates about US and Western military, financial, and political support for Ukraine against Russia, including arguments for and against continued aid, comparisons of contributions from different countries, and concerns over escalation or NATO involvement.

The cluster debates the use of traditional if-else statements versus conditional expressions like ternary operators, cond, and unless, focusing on syntax, readability, and language features that treat if as an expression.

The cluster focuses on concerns about the security vulnerabilities, hackability, and lack of trust in electronic voting machines, with strong advocacy for reverting to paper ballots to ensure reliable and verifiable elections.

Discussions center on blaming capitalism for short-termism, greed, exploitation, and perverse incentives in business and tech, while some defend it as a feature of human self-interest or efficient capital allocation.

Comments primarily praise, critique, or discuss the domain name of a featured project or service, highlighting its memorability, availability, cost, or suggesting better alternatives.

This cluster debates the value and role of software engineers in tech companies compared to executives and business roles, questioning if engineering is treated as a cost center or a core driver of business value.

Users recommend trackballs, vertical mice, and specific models like Logitech MX Ergo or MX Vertical to alleviate wrist pain and improve comfort over traditional mice.

The cluster centers on discussions about drones interfering with airplanes and helicopters, posing collision risks and causing airspace closures, alongside privacy concerns leading to people shooting down drones and ideas for countermeasures.

The cluster discusses the US dollar's role as the world's reserve currency, its economic benefits to the US, risks of losing that status due to sanctions and de-dollarization, and potential successors like RMB or ruble.

Cluster focuses on debates about whether programming languages are inherently fast or slow, emphasizing that performance depends on implementations, algorithms, and coding practices rather than the language itself, often challenging comparisons to C/C++.

Discussions revolve around Stack Overflow's strict moderation, question closures, and its primary role as a high-quality Q&A repository for future users rather than real-time help for askers.

This cluster centers on debates about the C programming language's strengths, weaknesses, suitability for modern use, and whether it should still be used for low-level and high-performance tasks.

Commenters repeatedly compare the article's service or infrastructure to AWS, pointing out that AWS already offers similar features, the company runs on AWS, or it's essentially AWS marketing.

This cluster centers on complaints about inadequate, incomplete, poorly written, or hard-to-navigate software documentation, with users preferring examples, tutorials, and blogs over official docs.

This cluster consists of comments linking to prior Hacker News threads and submissions discussing the same or similar articles, noting that the current post is a repeat or duplicate.

The cluster centers on complaints about political content being posted on Hacker News, including calls to flag such submissions as fake news or toxic, and debates over community bias, echo chambers, and polarization.

Comments focus on critiquing the pricing of software tools and SaaS products, debating affordability, per-user costs, monthly subscriptions, and comparisons to free or open-source alternatives.

Comments in this cluster are short, repetitive negations strongly refuting claims like 'it does,' 'it is,' 'they are,' or similar assertions in the thread.

Commenters debate the legality and regulatory status of the article's subject under EU laws, questioning if it's banned, permitted, or likely to face EU intervention.

The cluster centers on debates about the economics of nuclear power, including high capital and construction costs, comparisons to renewables and fossil fuels, decommissioning expenses, and factors like regulation and lost expertise making it uncompetitive.

The cluster centers on debates about the legal validity, enforceability, and limitations of Terms of Service (ToS) and End User License Agreements (EULAs), including whether they can override laws or justify company actions.

This cluster captures discussions about the strong anti-Microsoft sentiment on Hacker News, including criticisms of Microsoft's history of malice and shady practices, defenses against excessive bashing, and debates over bias in reactions to Microsoft actions.

The cluster centers on skepticism and criticism of the New York Times' reporting credibility, track record, and specific articles, with users questioning its reliability and motives in various contexts.

Commenters debate the optimal number of productive work hours per day or week for programmers and developers, frequently reporting 3-6 hours of deep, focused coding before burnout or diminishing returns set in.

Comments in this cluster repeatedly correct or question claims by pointing out that the linked article does not mention, support, or discuss the topics asserted by other commenters or the headline.

This cluster revolves around debates on the wisdom of rewriting software applications from scratch, frequently referencing Joel Spolsky's article arguing against it, and weighing risks like lost knowledge and delays against potential benefits like better architecture.

The cluster focuses on user comments about whether a specific email tool or feature works with Gmail, desires for native Gmail integration, comparisons to existing Gmail or Google Inbox functionalities, and related compatibility issues.

The cluster centers on discussions about Swift's usability, adoption, open-source status, and limitations for development beyond Apple platforms like iOS and macOS, including Linux, Windows, backend services, and cross-platform potential.

Users in this cluster repeatedly ask for simple explanations, definitions, or layman's terms for unfamiliar acronyms, technical jargon, or concepts mentioned in discussions.

The cluster centers on debates about using Excel for data tasks, highlighting its limitations for sophisticated work, advocating alternatives like proper tools or spreadsheets software, and discussing integrations or AI enhancements.

The cluster focuses on Intel's recent and ongoing challenges, including failures in innovation, competition with rivals like AMD, and skepticism about their ability to recover in the semiconductor market.

Users share experiences with Google Pixel and Nexus phones, praising their longevity, stock Android experience, and recommending them as alternatives to Samsung, Xiaomi, or other Android devices.

Discussions on the importance, benefits, and implementation of code reviews in software teams, often highlighting their role in catching bugs, educating developers, and improving code quality amid critiques of their absence or poor execution.

Discussions center on Angular's ongoing relevance, popularity, and future viability, with debates comparing versions like AngularJS/Angular 1 to newer ones, personal experiences, and defenses against claims of it dying out.

The cluster centers on debates about the importance of open source software, user preferences for OSS alternatives over proprietary options, and criticisms of non-open source tools.

The cluster focuses on discussions about the dangers of low-level radiation exposure, with commenters debating its risks versus chemical toxicity, often referencing the XKCD radiation chart and banana-equivalent doses to argue safety.

The cluster discusses challenges and proposed solutions for charging electric vehicles in apartments, street parking, and urban areas without home garages, emphasizing the need for public, utility-installed, and shared charging infrastructure over assumptions of home charging.

This cluster captures discussions where commenters request examples to support bold claims or arguments, provide or defend examples, critique their quality or relevance, and acknowledge fair points about them.

This cluster centers on debates about the value and necessity of writing tests in software development, including arguments on whether tests improve code quality, enable refactoring, catch bugs, or are a waste of time.

The cluster focuses on widespread complaints about PayPal's practices of arbitrarily freezing accounts, banning users, holding funds, and providing poor customer service, drawing from numerous user horror stories.

Commenters repeatedly suggest BitTorrent as an ideal solution for scalable content distribution or hosting in the discussed context, questioning why it isn't used and comparing it to alternatives like IPFS.

This cluster centers on comments where users explicitly affirm, clarify, or note their agreement with other commenters, often to resolve perceived misunderstandings or emphasize alignment.

Discussions revolve around the tech industry culture of expecting extreme work hours, weekends, and overtime, especially in startups, often criticized as a sign of broken processes, low productivity, and burnout risks.

Commenters express skepticism about passing legislation to solve issues, frequently requesting links to specific bills and questioning their effectiveness or details.

This cluster focuses on criticisms of Digital Rights Management (DRM), with commenters arguing it inconveniences legitimate users, fails to stop pirates, and harms consumer experience while advocating for DRM-free alternatives.

The cluster centers on debates about whether a financial service, likely a cryptocurrency mixer or privacy tool, enables or constitutes money laundering, with commenters frequently citing it as a primary risk or explanation.

The cluster revolves around debates on browsing the web without JavaScript, weighing privacy and performance benefits against the breakage of most modern sites and the expectation that JS is now essential.

Commenters repeatedly identify SaaS product opportunities in the article's topic, suggest building SaaS versions, and discuss SaaS business models versus alternatives.

The cluster centers on debates about Tailwind CSS, including its benefits for accessibility and productivity versus criticisms of readability, performance overhead, and deviation from traditional CSS principles.

Users repeatedly ask for download links, report them as missing, broken (e.g., 404 errors), or hard to find on the project page, expressing frustration over the lack of easy access to the software.

The cluster focuses on discussions about prompt engineering techniques for LLMs like ChatGPT, including sharing examples, challenges with reliability, and ideas like 'prompt engineering for humans' to improve responses.

Users repeatedly complain about the discussed website taking 30 seconds to several minutes to load, attributing it to high traffic or performance issues.

This cluster discusses tail-call optimization (TCO), its role in enabling efficient recursion without stack overflow, comparisons to iteration/loops, and the lack of TCO in many mainstream programming languages like Python.

Discussions focus on the critical role of team composition, talent, teamwork, and dynamics in tech projects and startups, debating whether strong teams outweigh ideas, processes, or individual stars.

Users vent frustrations about the difficulty of canceling online subscriptions, especially for news outlets like NY Times and WSJ, which often require contacting support or navigating multiple screens instead of offering one-click cancellation.

Users debate the user experience and interface of macOS compared to Windows and Linux, highlighting pros and cons in window management, app switching, consistency, gestures, and overall feel.

Cluster focuses on comparisons between Uber/Lyft ridesharing and traditional taxis, emphasizing Uber's improvements in convenience, pricing transparency, availability, and reliability over taxis' historical issues like scams, rudeness, and poor service.

This cluster captures comments where users express thanks and state their intention to try out recommended tools, techniques, ideas, or projects from parent comments.

Discussions center on whether specific symbols, icons, or characters should be added to the Unicode standard, debating its scope, universality, expansion, and existing contents.

Discussions revolve around whether a specific software feature can be easily disabled or turned off via settings, with users debating its availability and ease of access.

The cluster debates whether self-driving cars need to be perfect or just safer than average human drivers, highlighting human flaws like distraction and recklessness while noting AVs' potential advantages in safety and error correction.

The cluster centers on debates about TypeScript's merits versus plain JavaScript, including praises for productivity, tooling, and bug reduction, alongside criticisms of verbosity, complexity, and upfront costs.

Comments in this cluster primarily accuse other users, posts, or sources of spreading Russian propaganda, especially in threads related to Russia, Ukraine, and geopolitical events. Discussions often reference news articles debunking such claims and urge caution against disinformation.

Comments where users accuse each other of arguing in bad faith, being rude, or failing to engage productively, often resulting in refusals to continue the discussion.

Comments discuss how smart individuals can act foolishly, overestimate their intelligence, or contrast individual smarts with collective stupidity, often referencing the idea that 'a person is smart, people are dumb.'

Commenters reveal they are building similar projects to the original post and eagerly exchange contact information (emails in profiles, etc.) to chat, collaborate, or share feedback.

Discussions focus on criticizing the readability, maintainability, and quality of a dense, obscure code snippet, debating conciseness versus clarity and whether more code or less is better.

Users express nostalgia for the Pebble smartwatch's long battery life and simplicity, while recommending alternatives like Garmin, Withings, and Fitbit for notifications, fitness tracking, and always-on displays.

Discussions criticizing Reddit's toxicity, echo chambers, and poor discourse quality, often comparing it unfavorably to Hacker News and lamenting its influence on HN.

This cluster features users guessing each other's ages based on comments, preferences, or references that seem dated, with many revealing their own ages in playful responses.

Comments heavily referencing the Idiocracy meme 'It's what plants crave' (electrolytes), alongside discussions on plant care, growth, identification apps, and specific plant species.

Discussions revolve around Hacker News' moderation practices, including complaints of heavy censorship, shadow banning, and bias, defenses of its necessity, and frequent references to a New Yorker article on the topic.

Users lament the large size of modern smartphones and express a strong desire for smaller form factors like the iPhone Mini or SE, highlighting benefits for pocket fit, one-handed use, and hand comfort.

Commenters compare a modular product, system, or invention to Lego bricks, suggesting Lego versions, discussing alternatives, pricing, compatibility, and nostalgia.

The cluster centers on debates comparing self-driving cars to mass transit options like buses, trains, and subways, discussing their impacts on traffic congestion, efficiency, safety, urban space, and overall transportation solutions.

The cluster consists of short, highly positive comments expressing love, admiration, and enthusiasm for the Hacker News submission, such as a project, product, library, or similar item.

The cluster centers on advertisers refusing to place ads next to unethical, abusive, or controversial content, prompting platforms to moderate accordingly, alongside debates on ad ethics, regulations, and outright bans on advertising.

This cluster revolves around references to the infamous early Hacker News thread (item?id=9224) dismissing Dropbox as unoriginal and unnecessary, alongside debates on its success, competition, and usage despite initial ridicule.

The cluster centers on debates about whether income, wealth, or economic inequality is inherently bad, a symptom of other issues like poverty, or necessary for societal incentives and progress.

Discussions center on credit scores, their societal impact, criticisms of their fairness and necessity especially in the US compared to Europe, and frequent comparisons or distinctions from 'social credit' systems.

Comments where users express confusion and repeatedly ask others to explain or clarify the meaning of their statements or points.

This cluster revolves around comments accusing others of insults, name-calling (e.g., 'asshole', 'dick'), and rude behavior, often escalating into personal attacks or defenses against perceived incivility.

Commenters repeatedly inquire about the details, links, or nature of a specific side project or personal project mentioned in the thread, often prompting for shares or explanations.

Comments discuss various version control systems like Git, SVN, CVS, and others, comparing centralized vs. decentralized approaches, historical usage, and recommendations for tools like Fossil or Perforce.

Users criticize Ubuntu for issues like snaps, instability, old kernels, and marketing, while recommending switches to Debian, Fedora, Linux Mint, or other Linux distributions.

This cluster focuses on recommendations and discussions of Syncthing as an open-source tool for peer-to-peer file syncing across devices, often suggested as a superior alternative to proprietary services like Dropbox or BitTorrent Sync.

Commenters frequently suggest applying the article's technology to drones, discussing quadcopters, FPV piloting, Skydio comparisons, and gasoline-powered drone viability.

Comments focus on sarcastic and skeptical discussions about implementing and shipping new features in Rust projects, highlighting concerns over relevance, maintenance burdens, overanalysis, race conditions, reproducibility, and distractions like ML.

Commenters express skepticism toward claims of Apple breaching trust, lying, or aggressively handling leakers, repeatedly demanding citations, references, and official statements while speculating on PR stunts or misinformation.

Users recommend and debate free/open-source CAD software like FreeCAD, OpenSCAD, and CadQuery, comparing their usability and features to proprietary tools such as Fusion 360 and Solidworks.

Discussions center on arguments over the proper, literal, or evolving meanings of words, particularly how terms like 'literally' are used figuratively and whether this is misuse or accepted language evolution.

Comments emphatically rejecting ideas or answering questions with prolonged 'no's, often humorously highlighting that the answer is obviously no.

Discussions center on defining AI agents as LLM wrappers with tools, their effectiveness versus simple prompts, and skepticism toward frameworks like AutoGPT, BabyAGI, and LangChain.

Discussions revolve around comparisons of Go (Golang) with languages like Python, Java, C/C++, and Rust, focusing on reasons to choose Go, its advantages for web services, CLIs, concurrency, performance, and suitability for various tasks.

Comments primarily discuss issues with GitHub repository links on project websites, such as 404 errors, missing or broken links, requests for direct links, and reports of fixes.

Users repeatedly question and criticize whether a discussed project or technology is truly decentralized, highlighting centralizing aspects that undermine its claims. Discussions often reference crypto projects like Worldcoin and emphasize the hypocrisy in promoting decentralization while practicing centralization.

The cluster debates the vast differences in programming abilities, what defines a good or 10x programmer versus average or bad ones, and whether coding skill correlates with intelligence, people skills, or other factors.

Discussions center on criticisms of a company's poor security practices, negligence in addressing vulnerabilities, and debates over whether reported issues constitute serious security problems, often referencing past incidents.