Radiation Safety Debate

The cluster focuses on discussions about the dangers of low-level radiation exposure, with commenters debating its risks versus chemical toxicity, often referencing the XKCD radiation chart and banana-equivalent doses to argue safety.

πŸ“‰ Falling 0.4x Science
6,340
Comments
19
Years Active
5
Top Authors
#690
Topic ID

Activity Over Time

2008
11
2009
33
2010
183
2011
360
2012
153
2013
258
2014
171
2015
269
2016
285
2017
329
2018
253
2019
552
2020
463
2021
482
2022
639
2023
938
2024
394
2025
542
2026
25

Keywords

RPV HN DNA LNT cancer.fi UV www.cnn index.html xkcd.com NSPS radiation radioactive exposure dose sickness toxicity nuclear concern risk cancer

Sample Comments

perihelions β€’ Jul 1, 2025 β€’ View on HN

It's not radioactive enough to matter.

iancmceachern β€’ Mar 20, 2023 β€’ View on HN

I bet it's more about the toxic chemicals than the radiation...

scaredginger β€’ Jul 31, 2022 β€’ View on HN

ThanksThe link you provided indicates the level of radiation is negligible, so I'm not sure what your point is.

vorpalhex β€’ Dec 18, 2024 β€’ View on HN

"very little radiation" is still too much.

ris β€’ Oct 24, 2013 β€’ View on HN

Ask them about the radiation dose in banana-equivalent, then be less worried.

code_duck β€’ Jun 22, 2019 β€’ View on HN

Even when they come from a burning radioactive material?

sourcecodeplz β€’ Jan 7, 2022 β€’ View on HN

How about radiation? Could it not be a concern?

HillaryBriss β€’ Aug 26, 2017 β€’ View on HN

we're worse than radioactivity

blueflow β€’ May 1, 2015 β€’ View on HN

Did i miss something or did they think high-energy radiation was not dangerous?

JohnJamesRambo β€’ May 11, 2019 β€’ View on HN

Aren’t they exposed to higher radiation?