All Topics

Comments consisting almost entirely of short, highly enthusiastic exclamations like 'awesome', 'amazing', and 'great' in response to a popular Hacker News post or project.

This cluster consists of highly positive comments congratulating creators on excellent, impressive projects or achievements, often using phrases like 'nice work,' 'well done,' and 'awesome.'

Comments focus on the use of ad blockers for improving web browsing experience, reasons to enable or disable them, and websites' countermeasures like refusing content to ad blocker users.

Comments expressing agreement and positivity toward ideas, developments, or outcomes in HN discussions, typically phrased as 'that's a good thing' or similar endorsements.

Comments in this cluster overwhelmingly express enthusiasm and praise for a clever or innovative idea presented in the original post, often using phrases like 'great idea,' 'cool idea,' or 'excellent idea.'

Comments that reference or justify the nature of discussions by noting they are typical or expected on Hacker News itself.

Commenters joke about, question the validity of, and request specific numbers from the article, suspecting they are arbitrary, overly precise, or mixed up by an LLM.

Comments focus on speculation, inquiries, and announcements regarding whether a specific project or software will be open sourced, including questions about timelines, links to statements, and encouragement to do so.

Comments discuss merchant fees for credit card transactions, including interchange rates (1-3% in US vs. lower in EU), fixed fees impacting small purchases, rewards funded by these costs, and comparisons to cash or debit handling.

Comments sarcastically criticizing or attributing issues to Google's typical product behaviors, track record, or decisions in relation to the article's topic.

Users discuss DNS resolution failures, often with Cloudflare's 1.1.1.1 or ISP DNS, and recommend switching to alternatives like Google Public DNS, NextDNS, Quad9, or OpenDNS to resolve connectivity problems.

The cluster centers on debates about gun ownership, control, and rights, frequently invoking the 'guns don't kill people, people kill people' argument and comparing it to other issues like self-defense or societal safety.

Comments assert the absence of expected features, information, benchmarks, or other elements in discussed products, articles, or contexts, often dismissively stating 'nothing to see here' or 'no such thing'.

The cluster discusses the tension between personal choice in vaccination and societal responsibility for herd immunity, emphasizing protection of vulnerable people who cannot vaccinate and reducing healthcare burdens.

Comments primarily request Docker container or image support for a specific project, inquire about its availability, or discuss its necessity and usage.

Commenters emphasize that a discussed claim, situation, or issue applies only in the United States and not universally or in other countries.

Users recommend and discuss privacy-focused, secure, and alternative email services like ProtonMail, Fastmail, Mailbox.org, and self-hosted options, often as improvements over mainstream providers.

Commenters debate the merits and drawbacks of Excel for data tasks and business workflows, questioning why people still use it instead of programming languages or modern tools, while others defend its agility, flexibility, and ubiquity.

Discussions focus on the unique demographics, biases, and characteristics of the Hacker News audience, including its skew toward tech startups, programmers, and YC perspectives, as well as debates on HN's topic relevance and community curation.

Comments debate the effectiveness, enforcement challenges, compliance violations, and overall impact of the GDPR regulation on companies and privacy practices.

Comments primarily consisting of hyperlinks to other Hacker News item pages, used to reference or share related past discussions.

The cluster centers on debates about the definition, measurement, and true value of productivity in software development and work practices, often distinguishing between perceived productivity and actual output or questioning if certain tools or methods improve it.

Users recommend and compare mechanical keyboards, switches (e.g., Cherry MX, Topre), ergonomic designs like HHKB, Kinesis, and ErgoDox for better typing comfort, speed, noise levels, and wrist health.

Commenters debate the intended or correct meanings of words, phrases, and terminology in posts and discussions, often invoking the quote 'You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.' from The Princess Bride to highlight semantic misunderstandings.

Users repeatedly report that a website or web application fails to work in Firefox, while it functions in other browsers like Chrome and Safari; developers note it's a known issue under investigation.

Discussions focus on the importance, effectiveness, and limitations of two-factor authentication (2FA) in preventing account takeovers, including debates over phone-based vs. app-based methods and surprise at its absence in security incidents.

This cluster centers on complaints about users posting ChatGPT-generated content or responses on Hacker News, viewing it as spam, low-value, or imitative of human writing, alongside debates on its utility and popularity.

Commenters contrast attitudes, policies, and situations in France with those in the US, frequently citing French protests, strikes, social welfare, and labor protections as counterpoints or examples.

Discussions center on obtaining refunds for purchased products, especially lost, faulty, or unsatisfactory devices, including advice on contacting companies, consumer protections, and return policies.

Discussions praise and recommend JetBrains IDEs like IntelliJ and PyCharm for their superior features and integration, often comparing them favorably to VS Code and other editors.

This cluster revolves around users acknowledging typos in posts or comments, apologizing for them, and often confirming corrections or fixes.

Discussions focus on users running older, unsupported, or outdated software versions, concerns about lacking recent updates, and suggestions to upgrade to newer releases often available on GitHub.

Users enthusiastically discuss how a newly released open-source tool or feature perfectly matches their specific needs, question its novelty compared to existing options, and request more details like tutorials and comparisons.

Discussions center on the viability of SMS for communication, critiquing its reliability, costs, cross-platform limitations, and outdated features compared to modern apps like WhatsApp or Signal protocol.

Users express thanks for having overlooked or missed specific information, details, or points raised in the parent post or comments.

Users debate the quality of laptop trackpads, frequently comparing them to the superior MacBook trackpad while discussing alternatives like ThinkPad trackpoints, Linux/Windows support, and preferences over mice.

Cluster centers on debates about whether large language models (LLMs) truly think, reason, or understand like humans, or if they are just statistical next-token predictors without genuine cognition.

Comments discuss Rust's borrow checker, ownership semantics, lifetimes, and related features like RefCell, Rc, and Arc, comparing them to runtime reference counting and debating their benefits, costs, and limitations for memory safety.

This cluster centers on comments enthusiastically praising a specific article for being interesting, insightful, thought-provoking, and worth reading or sharing.

Comments debate the persistence of C and C++ in modern projects due to legacy code, lack of alternatives, backward compatibility, and comparisons to newer languages like Rust, questioning if they are becoming obsolete or evolving as the 'new C'.

Users debate whether a specific post or topic is 'political,' questioning Hacker News's no-politics rule and what constitutes political content.

Discussions center on the mechanics, risks, benefits, and strategies of short selling stocks, including questions about why shorting specific companies wouldn't work, its potential to destroy firms, and examples like short squeezes.

Users report bugs or errors in software projects, tools, or websites, with developers responding by requesting GitHub issues, investigating, reproducing, or announcing fixes.

The cluster discusses the importance of code readability over terseness, cleverness, and ease of writing, emphasizing that code is read more often than written and should prioritize maintainability and comprehension.

Commenters debate whether existing browser and HTTP caching mechanisms, like Cache-Control headers and ETags, sufficiently solve web performance issues such as page reloads and resource loading, often questioning the need for alternative approaches.

This cluster features comments enthusiastically promoting or humorously obsessing over the Rust programming language, often joking that projects are superior or noteworthy simply because they are 'written in Rust' or should be.

Users discuss the Hacker News ranking algorithm, questioning why high-upvote posts fail to reach or stay on the front page, suspecting biases, penalties, moderation, or favoritism toward certain users or content types.

The cluster centers on debates about whether depression is a legitimate clinical illness, a rational response to life circumstances, or over-simplified, with frequent analogies criticizing advice like 'just cheer up'. Discussions include personal experiences, stigma, causes, and misconceptions around mental health.

Users request chat functionality for apps, debate its necessity compared to tools like IRC, Slack, and Discord, and recommend alternative chat apps such as jmp.chat and Chatty.

Commenters repeatedly identify the discussed work approach, role, or business model as essentially consulting or what consultancy firms do, often contrasting it with product development, full-time employment, or startups.

The cluster debates the safety, side effects, and long-term risks of COVID-19 vaccines, with users citing studies, historical examples like Thalidomide and AstraZeneca, and questioning risk-benefit ratios compared to the virus itself.

This cluster consists of comments where users suggest better words or phrases, correct misspellings, misused terms, or debate appropriate terminology in discussions.

Discussions center on GitHub's evolution from a social coding platform to a developer social network, with debates over its features, user treatment, criticisms, and comparisons to social media.

Discussions center on the reasons behind recent mass layoffs at major tech companies, including over-hiring during the pandemic, economic downturns, efficiency measures, and theories of copycat or coordinated behavior to cut costs and depress salaries.

This cluster features comments challenging bold, strong, or unsubstantiated claims made by other users, repeatedly demanding evidence, citations, or proof to support them.

Comments discuss the reasons behind JavaScript's dominance in web development, defenses against its criticism or bashing, and alternatives like transpilers from other languages to JS.

The cluster centers on debates about the necessity, benefits, and drawbacks of using Docker for development, deployment, and dependency management, often comparing it to native OS packages, single binaries, or alternatives like Nix.

Discussions center on ad blockers like uBlock Origin blocking ads or causing website access problems, anti-adblock measures detecting and denying access, and recommendations for better blockers or workarounds.

Discussions center on the quality, availability, and effectiveness of public transportation systems, particularly critiquing underdevelopment in the US compared to Europe and other regions, and its role in reducing car dependency.

The cluster focuses on debates about the nature, problems, and irony of social media, including whether Hacker News qualifies as social media and complaints about it posted on similar platforms.

Users discuss Clojure's strengths including seamless JVM integration, superior productivity over Java, Lisp features, and comparisons to Common Lisp, Scala, and Haskell, often defending it against criticisms of failure or niche status.

Comments debate the purpose of copyright as a temporary incentive for creation to benefit society, criticizing its current form as distorted by corporations, overly long durations, and calls for abolition or major reform.

Discussions center on banks lacking support for a specific feature, with users surprised, recommending switches to better banks, and asking for names of problematic ones to avoid.

The cluster debates Rust's steep learning curve, complexity (especially the borrow checker and syntax), and comparisons to languages like C++ and Go, with users sharing personal experiences of difficulty or eventual mastery.

Users recommend and compare popular todo list and task management apps like Todoist, Things 3, TickTick, and others as alternatives to the original post's tool.

Commenters repeatedly accuse each other of misreading, misunderstanding, or misinterpreting previous comments, often leading to clarifications, apologies, and requests to re-read.

The cluster focuses on criticisms of capitalism, highlighting hypocrisy in free market advocacy ('free market for me, not for thee') and the pattern of privatizing profits while socializing losses.

Users share personal experiences switching between Firefox and Chrome as their primary browser, debating performance, speed, privacy, extensions, compatibility, and rendering issues.

Users debate and clarify the exact monthly and annual pricing of a SaaS product, expressing surprise at costs, perceived value, and billing details like per-user rates or annual commitments.

Users overwhelmingly recommend switching from LastPass and 1Password to Bitwarden, citing its superior usability, open-source nature, affordability, and reliability over competitors' issues like restrictions and poor sync.

This cluster centers on debates about remote versus in-office work, focusing on communication challenges, productivity, team collaboration, and the need for remote-first practices or in-person interactions.

Users discuss switching from Vim to Emacs, praising Emacs' extensibility, customization via Elisp, Org mode, and Evil mode for Vim emulation, while acknowledging Vim's modal editing strengths.

The cluster centers on discussions about the pros and cons of abstractions in programming, including leaky abstractions, the risks of excessive layers, and the balance between good and bad abstractions.

This cluster centers on discussions evaluating FPGAs as alternatives to ASICs, CPUs, and other hardware, questioning their suitability, advantages, speed, cost, and implementation in various applications like AI, networking, and real-time control.

Commenters debate accusations of misquoting, strawmanning, selective quoting, and disingenuous interpretations of each other's statements or the original article.

Comments speculating that current situations, features, or events will likely change or occur in the future, often using phrases like 'time will tell,' 'eventually,' or 'we'll see.'

Users debate whether experiences with AI models used GPT-4 or GPT-3.5, emphasizing GPT-4's superiority, access limitations, and performance differences.

Discussions center on Russia's current international power, its alliances and tensions with China, the US, West, and others, including debates on whether it's a declining power, vassal to China, or still a significant player in events like Ukraine.

Comments overwhelmingly assert that Russia is the aggressor who invaded Ukraine, rejecting arguments blaming the US, NATO, or Ukraine and countering whataboutism or justifications for the invasion.

This cluster features numerous company advertisements for software engineering roles, primarily frontend, fullstack, and backend positions at startups like Front, Payment Rails, Numeric, and others, specifying locations such as San Francisco, Paris, Montreal, and remote options.

Comments in this cluster provide critiques and suggestions for improving product landing pages, focusing on making them clearer, less sparse, and more informative with elements like screenshots, videos, and concise explanations of what the product does.

The cluster centers on discussions about the necessity, effectiveness, and implementation of tests in software development, with commenters debating whether specific bugs or issues should have been caught by proper testing.

Comments focus on the risks of Kickstarter projects failing to deliver, emphasizing that backing is philanthropy or funding rather than guaranteed product purchase, with debates on platform responsibilities and backer misconceptions.

Comments primarily accuse or highlight anti-vaccine sentiments and positions among Hacker News users, often in the context of ongoing debates about vaccines.

This cluster centers on discussions about caching in software development, including its pitfalls, benefits, implementations like KV and build caches, and debates on whether various optimizations are essentially just caching.

Comments primarily criticize LinkedIn's spammy and privacy-invasive behaviors, such as unsolicited connection requests, email harvesting, and unauthorized profile access or posting, often comparing them to the practices of the main article's subject.

This cluster revolves around debates over why comments on Hacker News receive downvotes, including explanations of voting reasons like poor tone or low value, complaints about unfair downvoting, and defenses of downvoted opinions.

The cluster centers on the military applications of drones, including cheap consumer models used as weapons in conflicts like Ukraine, their effectiveness in attacks, countermeasures such as anti-drone tech, and future concepts like autonomous swarms.

Comments in this cluster focus on debating, questioning, and confirming the correct pronunciation of a specific term or name from the HN article, often with references to official or canonical ways to say it. Samples show similar discussions on pronunciations of tech terms, names, and words like Fuchsia, GIF, and Wirth.

The cluster revolves around debates on trust, questioning who or what entities (like companies, projects, or individuals) are trustworthy, why trust must be earned rather than assumed, and the risks of misplaced trust in tech contexts.

Discussions center on the importance of latency in network and system performance, often highlighting it as a bigger issue than throughput for various use cases like internet access, HFT, and hardware.

The cluster centers on discussions about Apple's App Store guidelines, arbitrary enforcement, potential rejections or removals of apps, and criticisms of censorship or double standards.

Users share experiences of difficulties editing Wikipedia, including aggressive deletions by territorial or deletionist editors, inconsistent notability enforcement, and challenges in correcting articles.

Users repeatedly request a Firefox version or port of the featured tool, extension, or feature, often available for Chrome, and suggest alternatives like Firefox forks.

Comments primarily from maintainers and users confirming that reported software bugs have been fixed, often with links to updates or recent releases.

The cluster centers on debates about the prolonged transition from Python 2 to Python 3, including reasons for sticking with Python 2, migration challenges, backwards compatibility issues, and opinions on whether the break was a mistake.

Comments where users express enthusiasm for suggested ideas, often stating they will look into or try them.

This cluster consists of comments where users repeatedly challenge claims by demanding evidence, proof, or sources to support assertions made in various discussions.

Discussions center on excitement for projects or tools written in Go, requests for Go implementations or code, and references to Go resources, with some confusion or jokes about whether the featured project uses Go.

Users accuse each other of bias, question specific instances of alleged bias in arguments, articles, tools, or responses, and discuss concepts like selection and unconscious bias.