Misrepresentation Accusations

Commenters debate accusations of misquoting, strawmanning, selective quoting, and disingenuous interpretations of each other's statements or the original article.

πŸ“‰ Falling 0.5x Other
7,046
Comments
20
Years Active
5
Top Authors
#8098
Topic ID

Activity Over Time

2007
5
2008
22
2009
81
2010
132
2011
145
2012
178
2013
358
2014
219
2015
245
2016
340
2017
421
2018
384
2019
434
2020
620
2021
810
2022
743
2023
723
2024
474
2025
662
2026
50

Keywords

AFAIK FULL HilbertSpace STOP CANNOT CNN ycombinator.com words quote faith meaning disingenuous said interpretation bad faith context did say

Sample Comments

credo β€’ Jan 11, 2010 β€’ View on HN

what is misleading about what I said ?please answer that without making up any quotes.

mellosouls β€’ May 15, 2023 β€’ View on HN

You misrepresented what the article was saying - I was being polite in suggesting it was a misreading. Even if the article is wrongheaded, the alternative interpretation for you having done that is wilful misrepresentation due to whatever motivation or skewed perspective - which is part of the problem the article tries to address.

everdrive β€’ Oct 10, 2025 β€’ View on HN

That's an unfair strawman, and you're putting words in my mouth which I really did not intend. (or even imply)

cal5k β€’ Apr 7, 2018 β€’ View on HN

I think it's disingenuous to argue against words the above commenter did not actually write.

maxerickson β€’ Dec 19, 2015 β€’ View on HN

The statement about the intended meaning is there in an attempt to avoid this conversation. I was not putting the argument in their mouth, I was being bombastic in my criticism of their phrasing. If I was raising it as a serious argument, you are right, I probably wouldn't try to undermine it 10 words later.

secretkeyholder β€’ Feb 28, 2022 β€’ View on HN

My words included two options, one of which includes those words β€” and I disowned the first option. Please read it again and then read his comment again. Selective quoting won’t change that I was providing a reflection of two possible reads of his comments, and I endorsed the latter in good faith. If you think my first option is unreasonable as a characterization to write down, I’m not sure how I can more clearly express that this is a reading that someone can fairly arrive at - I just think it’

happytoexplain β€’ Apr 22, 2020 β€’ View on HN

This is dishonest. The author absolutely did not simply say "there are still people thinking it's not a big deal".

skoskie β€’ Oct 16, 2025 β€’ View on HN

That is not at all what they said. Your interpretation seems disingenuous.

zepto β€’ Nov 16, 2016 β€’ View on HN

I didn't misrepresent you - the text I quoted was part of your argument. If you didn't mean it, why did you say it? If you did mean it, then why not simply stand behind it?

arp242 β€’ Mar 31, 2024 β€’ View on HN

Anything can be viewed as a judgement statement if you paraphrase or stretch things enough. I don't think your paraphrasings are a fair representation of what I actually said.But you can insert "I'm not trying to blame anyone, but here are some suggestions to modify cultural norms so these things are less likely to happen in the future" if you want. Or you can just assume good faith and take that as implied unless demonstrated otherwise.