Film Frame Rates

Discussions center on the 24fps standard in movies, the role of motion blur in creating smooth motion, and debates over high frame rates, TV frame interpolation, and the soap opera effect.

📉 Falling 0.5x Hardware
2,954
Comments
18
Years Active
5
Top Authors
#9716
Topic ID

Activity Over Time

2009
5
2010
45
2011
114
2012
187
2013
161
2014
130
2015
101
2016
68
2017
176
2018
138
2019
191
2020
160
2021
144
2022
331
2023
412
2024
251
2025
321
2026
19

Keywords

e.g II X0 FPS CG episode.html youtube.com LCD LG tftcentral.co fps motion frame blur film interpolation movies films frames video

Sample Comments

rangibaby Jan 22, 2017 View on HN

Film's subjective fps is actually higher than 24 fps because of motion blur.

sk5t Sep 17, 2013 View on HN

Perhaps you watched it on a system with the horrible, high-framerate interpolation switched on? Not everyone is sensitive to 24fps (traditional film) vs. 30fps (looks like Handicam output) and the effects of TV/processor motion enhancement.

naz Apr 20, 2011 View on HN

Movies have motion blur which smooths out the judders of a low framerate

mattowen_uk Nov 16, 2021 View on HN

The 24Hz/fps thing is a legacy from original film where it was the sweet spot that created the effect of a moving image without too much flicker, unfortunately you seem to be one of those people who are sensitive to this frame rate.The argument is that the general populous are used to the 'film look' of 24fps, that anything else diminishes the impact of watching a film. Films that have tried high fps (The Hobbit for example) received negative reviews for picture quality; people

stephen_g Dec 27, 2013 View on HN

Almost all movies are still filmed at 24fps.The thing is, movies aren't shown at 24fps - they actually flash each frame on and off a few times to reduce flicker.It used to be done with a multiple bladed shutter on film projectors, but I believe digital projectors and TVs can do the same thing (on the TV if you turn off that awful motion interpolation that they all have turned on by default for some reason).But one thing movies don't typically have is a very fast moving mouse p

DoctorWhoof Dec 30, 2025 View on HN

Most of the issues (like "judder") that people have with 24fps are due to viewing it on 60 fps screens, which will sometimes double a frame, sometimes triple it, creating uneven motion. Viewing a well shot film with perfect, expressive motion blur on a proper film screen is surprisingly smooth.The "soap opera" feel is NOT from bad interpolation that can somehow be done right. It's inherent from the high frame rate. It has nothing to do with "video cameras",

gowld Mar 19, 2020 View on HN

Movies look like garbage in >30fps.That's why moviemakers beg audiences not to do frame interpolation.

ralusek Feb 6, 2020 View on HN

No, I'm not. The frame interpolation is actually pretty good, and approximates high framerate relatively well. It is the high framerate itself which causes this effect, however. I've seen two movies in theater at high framerate that were shot as such (The Hobbit and another I'm forgetting), as well as the ability to watch high framerate content on YouTube, and it is absolutely the high framerate that is jarring in cinematic content.

ivank Aug 3, 2019 View on HN

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EM16aiSSpFk A Defense of 24 FPS

sp332 May 19, 2018 View on HN

I think it's because of the motion blur. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8793346#8794004 With only 24 fps, we have come to depend on motion blur on each frame to give us motion information. It can be manipulated intentionally (like removing motion blur to make moves in a fight scene feel more abrupt), but if changes don't match what we expect it can feel weird.