Guantanamo Bay Detentions

Discussions center on US practices of indefinite detention without trial at Guantanamo Bay, including torture, lack of due process for non-citizens and potentially citizens, and comparisons to other countries' actions.

➡️ Stable 1.1x Politics & Society
3,815
Comments
20
Years Active
5
Top Authors
#9655
Topic ID

Activity Over Time

2007
4
2008
3
2009
29
2010
84
2011
68
2012
143
2013
677
2014
215
2015
152
2016
203
2017
169
2018
155
2019
254
2020
213
2021
301
2022
267
2023
207
2024
153
2025
476
2026
42

Keywords

PACER US IMHO www.npr OK NK texastribune.org AI jonathanturley.org HN citizens trial torture detained imprisoned prisoners military indefinitely bay doj

Sample Comments

bloodorange Aug 1, 2020 View on HN

Given you are talking about a country which had no qualms about kidnapping people from other countries and also holds people indefinitely without trial, I suppose you are right.

salman89 Mar 4, 2013 View on HN

Besides for executing minors/mentally handicapped, the US does all those things. Torture (waterboarding), hold prisoners without trial/charge (Guantanamo Bay), allow their leaders to execute citizens summarily (drone strikes), incarcerate people at a high rate for benefit of state sponsored corporations (drug war - privatized jails). I'm not arguing politics - I don't think HN is the place for it, but you should evaluate your perspective and how it might be changing how you view the world.

thefounder Feb 17, 2019 View on HN

You can't compare them. No American accused of terrorist activity on US soil has ever been held at Guantanamo Bay.If you hang around with terrorists in a war zone(i.e Afganistan) you can expect your rights to be violated. Surely mistakes are made in a war. That quite different than being kidnapped from your home for expressing different political views.

TheCoelacanth Sep 18, 2025 View on HN

They didn't get due process, so there's no way to be sure that American citizens aren't getting sent there.

rangibaby Mar 6, 2017 View on HN

That is how citizens of the US are treated. Non-citizens end up in places like Guantanamo.

archagon Mar 17, 2025 View on HN

It's already likely that some people were shipped to Guantanamo who were not criminals[1][2]. They were kept in horrible conditions without media access and left without legal recourse or any means of communication with the outside world. Is that OK with you? What happens when Trump decides that "Democrats" or "leftists" are the enemy now, as he's been continuously suggesting[2]?[1]: <a href="https://www.texastribune.org/2025/02/13/i

rchaud Apr 11, 2019 View on HN

Things like "charges" and "due process" are a luxury for the thousands who were kidnapped, imprisoned and tortured by past US administrations.People like Assange are fortunate to have visibility and nationality that they do. He at least is getting charged for a crime he hasn't really even denied. Thousands of others have lost their freedom and their lives because they were at the wrong place at the wrong time.

machomaster Nov 9, 2025 View on HN

You should ask AI go give you a long list of people who were arrested/captured/kidnapped/killed by the USA for the things they did outside of the US. Often, without doing anything illegal (locally, but sometimes even by US law).Guantanamo bay exists outside of the US territory for a reason, so that no legal rules would apply. CIA/USA has been keeping secret prisons and torturing people all around the world (incl. EU).

jwr Jul 7, 2021 View on HN

> But not because some government official suddenly decided they shouldYou mean like this guy, for example? https://www.npr.org/2020/12/11/945565473/u-s-clears-for-rele...Or the (by now, likely in the thousands) people killed by US drone attacks?I don&#x

strlen Aug 2, 2009 View on HN

Perhaps "outside of your civil jurisdiction, involving people who aren't your country's citizens" is a better way to put it (the only, so far, exception to this seems to be Jose Padilla-- yet even then he didn't "disappear"). However, that's odd for me to have this sort of argument, I am against extra-judicial detention. Either someone is a PoW (if they're a member of an army that follows the rules of war) or they're a criminal.