Art Definition Debate
Comments debate the nature of art, its subjectivity, whether calling something art makes it so, and if art requires utility or purpose beyond itself.
π Falling 0.5x Other
5,199
Comments
20
Years Active
5
Top Authors
#9624
Topic ID
Activity Over Time
2007 3
2008 10
2009 51
2010 110
2011 127
2012 227
2013 142
2014 179
2015 183
2016 193
2017 217
2018 296
2019 306
2020 310
2021 512
2022 626
2023 573
2024 589
2025 494
2026 53
Top Contributors
Keywords
OK AND McCloud i.e art artist artistic painting entertainment dignity aesthetically utility pleasing intent
Sample Comments
Itβs okay to look at things as art. Not everything needs to be explained to have value.
art is supposed to be for art sake
Calling something artistic does not make it so.
This comment could be talking about all art.
Maybe this is some kind of art that doesn't need to be useful.
This is art. Art shouldn't be confined to foreign interests like making money
What art can't you say that about?
Art doesn't want a purpose
Sounds good, I don't actually care about "art" then, based on your definition.
Something can't be art simply by virtue of being called art.