British Colonialism Legacy

The cluster focuses on discussions about the British Empire's colonial history, its exploitation of resources and people in colonies like India, and the lasting economic and social impacts on both the UK and former colonies.

📉 Falling 0.5x Politics & Society
4,735
Comments
20
Years Active
5
Top Authors
#949
Topic ID

Activity Over Time

2007
8
2008
8
2009
17
2010
114
2011
76
2012
69
2013
99
2014
61
2015
164
2016
244
2017
279
2018
275
2019
371
2020
391
2021
562
2022
569
2023
490
2024
461
2025
421
2026
60

Keywords

II US WW2 UK USA WWI i.e U.K EU WW british colonialism empire india britain colonization colonial colonies economic countries

Sample Comments

lozenge Aug 27, 2021 View on HN

It might be something to do with the centuries of colonialism where the natural resources, labour and human lives of entire countries was stolen for the economic benefit of the United Kingdom.

emteycz Mar 7, 2021 View on HN

You really need to update your knowledge of history. Look at Belgian, French, Dutch and British colonial empires. Especially the Belgian one and its brutality might interest you. And the British one was active in Middle East waaaay before America.

ujkiolp Jul 28, 2025 View on HN

the empire was always propped by colonialization - there wasn’t much to go once the colonies were no longer a cash cow for the UK

rafram Jan 23, 2025 View on HN

Well, maybe Britain shouldn't have colonized large areas of the globe and exploited them for resources while keeping the indigenous inhabitants oppressed for centuries, all while preaching the absolute supremacy of British civilization and culture. Hardly seems surprising that some of the people you colonized might want to see what all the fuss is about.

hef19898 Nov 13, 2018 View on HN

Different times, back during the higjt of the british empire war and colonization have been normal things to do. Even the British were quite aggrez, but still not out of the norm. This whole land grabbing kind of war ended to be a thing with WW 2. So you can still be as aggressive as the British back then, it just manifests itself in different ways. Also, nowadays it is a lot easoer to control countries by economic means alone.

krona Sep 24, 2024 View on HN

I thought colonialism was a bad thing?

astine Oct 21, 2009 View on HN

Doesn't that have something to do with the British Empire?

chimeracoder Sep 22, 2017 View on HN

> It is actually amazing how little British folks today know about their own historical misdeeds, they may accept the issues towards USA and other countries but tend to downplay atrocities magnitudes higher in India and other countriesTo add to this, it's not just the British. The Portuguese, French, Dutch, Danish, and Swedish (among others) colonized parts of India long before the British did, and the Portuguese and French also kept their colonies in India much longer. When p

kome Mar 3, 2022 View on HN

are you talking about the British empire?

thriftwy Oct 16, 2023 View on HN

I'm not sure it is dramatically different from people in London imposing railroads on the English countryside.It's colonialism all the way down and the apparent ironic fact that British still cannot get out of other nations' hair while they now peddle the colonialism narratives.They cannot keep away from be interminged in countries' affairs while lecturing the "natives" about the colonialism, whose narratives also come from London and are as unnatural in their