Particles vs Fields
The cluster debates whether subatomic particles like electrons and photons are real discrete entities or merely excitations and manifestations of underlying quantum fields in quantum field theory.
Activity Over Time
Top Contributors
Keywords
Sample Comments
Why aren't electrons photons?
Particles don't really exist - they're merely what it looks like when we make a measurement of a field.
Why do there need to be particles? I don't think there are.
What if that's what subatomic particles actually are?
Is "particle" the correct model, or is it just very useful?
Are virtual particles a real thing or just a description of the underlying system?
Yeah, everything is just like photons, everything is a wave/particle
Are these physical objects? Do they have mass, energy, volume, a position or speed, charge, color charge, weak hyper charge, spin etc?
What the hell are "quantum particles"?
Particles don't really exist. Nor do waves for that matter either. Generally these days, it's considered more correct to think in terms of fields and excitations. Even then though it's important to realize that what we're working with are models. Very powerful and extremely accurate models, but still models nonetheless at the end of the day.