Damages Liability Debate
The cluster discusses who bears responsibility for damages in scenarios involving accidents, negligence, service failures, or false claims, often debating insurance coverage, accountability without fault, and compensation for affected parties.
Activity Over Time
Top Contributors
Keywords
Sample Comments
The damage is still yours even if its not your fault
As long as you yourself pay for the potential "avoidable" damage: sure!
why shouldn't the customer be able to recover damages from you if you had an accident, or were negligent? they were paying you to take care of this stuff for them. if they wanted the risk of accident and incompetence, they'd just do it themselves.
There don't have to be damages?
Yeah and whose responsibility is it when not catched in time and there this consequences / damage ?
This is absurd, if they cause the damages, they should be on the hook to pay for them too.
That might be misconstrued as property damage :D
Presumably talking about damages.
Insurance won't cover if you knew there was a fault and didn't fix it!
The point isn't a personal payout, the point is to hold the negligent party responsible