Article Credibility Criticism
Users heavily criticize the linked article as clickbait, FUD, sponsored content, PR puff pieces, or misleading with ulterior motives like self-promotion.
Activity Over Time
Top Contributors
Keywords
Sample Comments
if you read a little further down on in the comments section, you'd see that the article is pretty much a clickbait/FUD piece, and the author has a history of writing clickbait/FUD articles.
After reading this article I can't help wondering if the writer was "sponsored"...
Ooh so the "article" is really a marketing blurb for that other service!
The article is seemingly sensationalist for the sake of sensationalism?
The whole article sounds like a PR piece, I'm surprised it was so well received here.
Not sure if we're reading the same article?!To me this reads like a PR puff piece commissioned by the minions of an ego-maniac.
Not a convincing article. Although the writer of the post is in good standing, I doubt the motives.
This is just FUD, perhaps this article was written after someone received an amount of money to write it?
That's because the article is just a thinly veiled ad for the author's ad-free service.
You're actually right.How is this even considered an article? Can't find the author too, perhaps it's automated?