Logical Paradoxes Debate
Discussions center on critiquing self-contradictory statements, logical inconsistencies, paradoxes like 'this sentence is false,' and flaws in arguments claiming no absolute truth.
Activity Over Time
Top Contributors
Keywords
Sample Comments
It’s not true, but if it were true then it’s true?
It's not logically consistent. You're claiming that p implies not p
If it were true you would never know the difference => your comment proves/refutes nothing
Saying A is true doesn’t imply that the inverse of A is not true…
Comment A shouldn't be taken as a statement of boolean logic that can be disproved with a single counterexample.
your statement doesn't only have to be logic, it should also even remotely resemble reality. it doesn't.
“there is no absolute truth” sounds awful like a statement of absolute truth
No? You have a logic flaw here, you've inverted the consequent, which does not imply an inverted antecedent.
Given false assumptions, anything can be proven.
"All categorial statements are false, including this one"