AI vs Machine Learning Terminology

The cluster centers on debates about whether current technologies like machine learning should be labeled as 'AI', criticizing it as hype or marketing while others defend its broad historical usage.

➡️ Stable 0.8x AI & Machine Learning
3,175
Comments
20
Years Active
5
Top Authors
#9170
Topic ID

Activity Over Time

2007
8
2008
2
2009
18
2010
20
2011
18
2012
11
2013
21
2014
24
2015
50
2016
168
2017
171
2018
216
2019
235
2020
214
2021
224
2022
183
2023
498
2024
547
2025
518
2026
29

Keywords

CS AI MUST AGI LLM IA ML BS wikipedia.org BTW ai machine learning learning machine ml term ai ai artificial intelligence ia

Sample Comments

make3 Apr 25, 2019 View on HN

machine learning is fine, it's meaningful technical term at least. AI doesn't mean anything

YeGoblynQueenne Apr 27, 2018 View on HN

"AI" still means "Artificial Intelligence", a broad field that includes machine learning. If you think otherwise, I would like to hear why, please.

RamblingCTO Jan 1, 2024 View on HN

Can we stop calling everything AI if it's not?

circuit10 Apr 13, 2023 View on HN

The word AI has come to mean machine learning of any kind, which definitely exists. Maybe you’re thinking of AGI (artificial general intelligence)?

IshKebab Oct 17, 2025 View on HN

How does "it's called machine learning not AI" help anyone know how it works? It's just a fancier sounding name.

gnaritas Apr 18, 2017 View on HN

The timeless problem of AI, anything that starts out AI ends up being rebranded as not AI once it's understood. It's the no true Scotsman fallacy. Machine learning is AI, it's just not human level AI.

sandover May 16, 2018 View on HN

It's machine learning. It's not AI. Please, all, let's try hard to use words that mean what they mean.

segfaultbuserr Nov 24, 2020 View on HN

It's my understanding as well, many things that a modern programmer thinks in term of "computation" were once considered to be "AI". Lisp and Prolog were "AI", even the A* algorithm is still considered a rudimentary form of "AI" in textbooks just because it uses heuristics. There's a joke that says "every time AI researchers figure out a piece of it, it stops being AI" [0].It's why I use "AI" and "ML" interch

flowisgreat Apr 18, 2024 View on HN

I've worked on ML, and AI before, and there's no real reason not to call it AI for convenience imo. "AI" is the hype word, so why not :)

bonoboTP Jan 13, 2016 View on HN

That's a question of terminlogy. Nowadays AI seems to include machine learning as a subfield. It doesn't matter much. But AI is a sexy term again (after the years of the AI winter), and companies market machine learning under AI now. Also, classic AI books now include ML, not just symbolic stuff, logic, planning and graph search.