Text vs Video Preference

Commenters overwhelmingly prefer text over video for technical and informational content, arguing that text is faster to read, more skimmable, searchable, and accessible than videos.

📉 Falling 0.5x Other
3,264
Comments
20
Years Active
5
Top Authors
#9150
Topic ID

Activity Over Time

2007
7
2008
25
2009
86
2010
84
2011
94
2012
136
2013
125
2014
117
2015
114
2016
155
2017
168
2018
201
2019
178
2020
243
2021
324
2022
267
2023
320
2024
351
2025
249
2026
22

Keywords

e.g SCRUBS www.bbc ucpress.edu co.uk x.com YouTube YES VR video text information videos format audio density reading faster read

Sample Comments

renox Dec 27, 2013 View on HN

I don't get the point of videos here, it doesn't seem to bring much benefit and text would be much faster to read..

Mendenhall Jun 18, 2016 View on HN

I cant stand videos for most information. By the time the video loads and the probably slow speaking individual goes over just the introduction of the information, I could have already read a more informative article/post.

enriquto Oct 27, 2018 View on HN

Am I the only one who is utterly incapable to learn anything from a video? I read many hours per day, and look at figures, and try to understand them. But I cannot stand to wait for a three-minute video to finish. Why do people prefer linear videos to text that you can read at a whole?

marcus_holmes Oct 19, 2022 View on HN

video is a really bad format for this kind of content, imho. I can read faster than the video can explain. Even at 2x or 3x speed, it's still faster to read, especially if I'm only skim-reading to find interesting bits.

code_duck Jun 13, 2021 View on HN

My issue is that I don’t find it convenient to watch a video at all. For answering simple questions, there are many drawbacks to the format compared to text. I can usually extract necessary information from text in seconds. I might have to turn on a video and wait several minutes to hear the relevant information or spend minutes searching through it. Info in videos is not searchable by keywords or easily copy/pastable, and I may be in an environment where I don’t want to turn the sound up.

shade Dec 19, 2014 View on HN

Reading. It's faster for me, and too many videos don't have closed captioning so I miss too much of the information in them.

jgilias Nov 1, 2021 View on HN

Going on a bit of a tangent here, but I would really prefer if less people chose video as the medium to explain things. For me at least it's markedly easier, quicker, and convenient to read things.

galangalalgol Dec 6, 2023 View on HN

Video as a format seems drastically overused to me. When I go to the internet to find some information, I either get ai generated essays of great length and no substance, or a link to YouTube. I'm not wasting my time watching a video even if it is sped up, just to learn something that could have been cleanly represented as a short document. If more people start using documents instead of videos where they stare at you and speak, I am in favor of this series of events.

jfengel Mar 26, 2021 View on HN

So I'll take it that's a "no", then?Text is a much better way for me to look at a topic deeply. I can reread a sentence, copy and paste things into Google, and generally take it at my pace rather than theirs. Text can contain links to further informationThings that exist only in video make me suspicious that they're persuading me rather than informing me.

andybak Sep 25, 2020 View on HN

I can't find a gap in my life that fits video.Audio maybe as I can listen while walking/driving.But video stops me multitasking, I can't skim at my own pace, the speed of information delivery is order of magnitude slower than reading and skipping back and forth is much harder than with text+images.I just honestly can't find a role for video where it's not significantly worse than reading+images (+ allowing for small, embedded video snippets for things that need