US School Funding Debate
The cluster centers on debates about whether US public schools are underfunded, with most comments arguing that per-student spending is high compared to other countries but poorly allocated due to bureaucracy, local property taxes, and administrative bloat rather than insufficient total funding.
Activity Over Time
Top Contributors
Keywords
Sample Comments
Funding varies wildy based on location as it comes from local property taxes. Not all schools would need such increases. Thanks to that local funding scheme, the US tends to spend the most on the kids that need it the least.
Somebody decided not to fund schools properly.
I'm not sure if this is a funding problem. US public schools spend almost the same amount per student ~10k. I find it more likely that there's a difference in how resources are allocated in public vs private institutions.
Negatory. Us shovels more funding per student into its public schools than almost any other country. That funding is spend poorly, mostly on administrative functions that no doubt demonstrate in great detail how great each school is.https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator/cmd
Funding works strangely in USA public education. Schools in any given district seem to have a "hull speed" when it comes to money.Once a certain amount of dollars are actually reaching the class room, adding more dollars will simply see most of the additional funds absorbed by hiring more administrators, prestige projects like sports facilities, "classroom technology" projects etc.To detect this limit, simply check the level at which teachers begin paying for school sup
> underfunded educationI was sympathetic to your argument until this part. It varies by region, but we spend what seems like a fortune on school. DC public schools spent over $18,000 per student in 2010 [0]. That's more than my state college tuition. Where does that money go?[0]: http://www.census.gov/newsroom/r
My district spends $29k per student. More than almost any other in the world. Yet some of its schools are so bad that a quarter of high schoolers opted out. It's not about funding. It's an overwhelmingly blue area, politicians are not purposefully sabotaging the schools. The government is just utterly incompetent, and worse, corrupt. And unfortunately many of the students are from households that don't emphasize the importance of education.
Kind of what happens when your school funding is based on local tax revenues
We spend more than almost every country. It's not low in poor areas either; for example, Detroit Public Schools has much higher funding than the state average in Michigan.The problem is not the amount being spent.https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/sep/07/us-education...
Not every problem can be solved by throwing money at it.The US spends more per student than essentially every other country in the world (besides the few statistical anomalies like Luxembourg), and most of the areas with poor-performing schools are funded at an equivalent level to nearby schools that are high-performing, thanks to large state and Federal subsidies to make up for lower local taxes.