US Senate Filibuster

The cluster focuses on the filibuster rule in the US Senate, which requires 60 votes to advance most legislation, leading to discussions about legislative gridlock, exceptions like budget reconciliation, and blocking by senators like Manchin, Sinema, and McConnell.

➡️ Stable 0.8x Politics & Society
4,040
Comments
19
Years Active
5
Top Authors
#8850
Topic ID

Activity Over Time

2008
11
2009
14
2010
84
2011
57
2012
84
2013
211
2014
65
2015
105
2016
206
2017
240
2018
213
2019
286
2020
473
2021
324
2022
467
2023
293
2024
273
2025
615
2026
19

Keywords

US SMITH McConnell RUBIO COLLINS WARNER CORTEZ BI McCarthy ERNST senate votes vote senators democrats mr legislation 60 passed majority

Sample Comments

u801e • Mar 2, 2023 • View on HN

Probably because the majority in the legislative is not filibuster proof, and there are always a few representatives or senators who disagree with the proposal and prevent it from going to a floor vote. Recent examples of such individuals are Manchin and Sinema. Lieberman was another one who managed to get the public option removed from the ACA before it was passed.

cardamomo • Mar 9, 2025 • View on HN

There was some debate whether or not to remove the rule requiring a 60% vote to end filibusters in the Senate. Because this rule still stands, most laws cannot pass without 60 Senators' votes. Budget reconciliation bills, however, can be advanced with only a simple majority of the Senate. Though this is not a recent rules change, much recent legislation has gone through the reconciliation process to avoid the supermajority requirement.

eru • May 29, 2025 • View on HN

Wouldn't they still have to deal with filibusters?

throwaway2048 • Feb 6, 2020 • View on HN

Not congress in plural, the republican held senate, and specifically Mitch McConnell blocking almost every bill.

CabSauce • Nov 4, 2021 • View on HN

Unfortunately, anything passed in the senate requires 60 votes or need to be passed during reconcilliation (one bill per year). This is due to the use of the fillibuster to stop anything else from being considered.

ssklash • Jun 3, 2020 • View on HN

Absolutely. Want to see a great breakdown? https://np.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/2kaubu/just_a_remi...

ivewonyoung • Feb 14, 2025 • View on HN

Senate needs 60 votes to avoid a filibuster. Democrats have enough votes to stop any bill from passing except budget reconciliation.

InclinedPlane • Nov 21, 2011 • View on HN

A filibuster can be used to block legislation that only has a bare majority of support in the Senate. If legislation has the support of more than 60 senators then no filibuster can stop it. It can be a good thing in that it raises the bar for passing legislation and protects minority but still popular opinions.

jagraff • Jun 8, 2023 • View on HN

Due to the filibuster, most bills require 60 votes (60%) to pass the senate. It hasn’t lead to more cooperation - it’s lead to a paralyzed government that can’t pass good laws.

zappb • May 23, 2025 • View on HN

They don’t have 60 senators which is required to pass anything besides the budget these days thanks to the filibuster.