City Density Comparisons

Discussions focus on comparing population sizes, densities, and metro areas of cities like San Francisco, New York, London, Tokyo, and others, debating appropriate metrics such as city proper versus metropolitan populations and urban density.

📉 Falling 0.3x Politics & Society
4,250
Comments
20
Years Active
5
Top Authors
#8676
Topic ID

Activity Over Time

2007
1
2008
14
2009
31
2010
45
2011
77
2012
60
2013
179
2014
145
2015
216
2016
284
2017
305
2018
401
2019
388
2020
437
2021
343
2022
367
2023
397
2024
337
2025
218
2026
5

Keywords

NY ACSD LA US SanFrancisco DC TX LOTS B19301 UK population city million nyc area metro density bay area cities san

Sample Comments

chillacy Mar 4, 2019 View on HN

SF and Seattle have populations under 1 million in the city proper. London and NY are something like 8 and 9 million respectively. So I suspect population size matters (and density too).

azernik May 15, 2012 View on HN

He's not - he's comparing them to two of the densest cities in the Bay Area (San Francisco and San Jose). The New York boroughs each have a bit less than half the land area of their Bay Area equivalents, but have much higher populations.

earth-adventure Oct 18, 2024 View on HN

Density within cities, and a countries' population density are not comparable

csomar Apr 27, 2025 View on HN

They should replace this with a density metric. If a city is big enough, it becomes just "cities" next to each other. The difference is in central density and time from the extremities to the center. In this case, Chongqing, HongKong and Paris are denser than say Los Angeles; even though the Los Angeles metro area has a comparable/higher number of people.

Tijdreiziger Feb 11, 2022 View on HN

On a planetary scale, I wouldn't actually consider that 'pretty fucking big'. For comparison (metro areas, figures from Wikipedia):San Francisco: 4.7 millionBerlin: 6.1 millionLondon: 14.3 millionNYC: 20.1 millionShenzhen: 23.3 millionTokyo: 37.5 million

zanny Oct 15, 2013 View on HN

But both of those cities have their metropolitan areas measured in tens of millions of people, versus SF in the single millions. SF has the rates of a city ten times its size because its population density is so constrained.

conanbatt Dec 28, 2020 View on HN

Compare the density of SF to the one on NYC. It clearly has helped more people.

socalgal2 Sep 8, 2025 View on HN

The population of Switzerland is ~9 million. The population of LA metro is around 15 million, and NYC metro aroound 20 millionLA "the city" might be less but you can't tell where LA ends and it's other parts begin. It's one giant metropolis. Same with NYC.

mrits Feb 18, 2024 View on HN

Even then it should be compared to a city in the US as they would sometimes not even be a top 10 by metroplex population

vitus May 31, 2022 View on HN

Put more concretely: the population of NYC proper (ignoring the broader metro) and Switzerland are pretty comparable (both around 8-9m people), but NYC is about 50x more dense (300 mi² vs 16000).