Methane vs CO2 Impact

The cluster debates the climate effects of methane emissions compared to CO2, focusing on methane's higher potency as a greenhouse gas and whether burning it to produce CO2 is environmentally beneficial.

📉 Falling 0.1x Science
3,129
Comments
20
Years Active
5
Top Authors
#8657
Topic ID

Activity Over Time

2007
2
2008
15
2009
11
2010
12
2011
7
2012
15
2013
46
2014
50
2015
67
2016
137
2017
189
2018
189
2019
392
2020
312
2021
334
2022
494
2023
412
2024
332
2025
105
2026
8

Keywords

EPA NH4NO3 scientificamerican.com GHGI CO2 GHG ozone.html SI envchemgroup.com factcheck.org methane co2 greenhouse gas carbon atmosphere emissions natural gas burning fossil

Sample Comments

khuey • Nov 1, 2022 • View on HN

The way methane "exits" the atmosphere is by becoming CO2, so it's strictly worse.

bryanlarsen • Mar 10, 2020 • View on HN

The methane is burnt and turned into CO2, it's not released.

mschuster91 • Oct 22, 2015 • View on HN

The methane burns off so it's "just" CO2.

snovv_crash • Jun 19, 2022 • View on HN

Doesn't methane break down much more rapidly than CO2?

mrfusion • Nov 20, 2016 • View on HN

We're talking about methane not carbon.

6d6b73 • Aug 16, 2019 • View on HN

It is if you're on the receiving end of the methane emissions :)

dharma1 • May 19, 2017 • View on HN

Not just CO2 - methane is about 25x as potent in terms of global warming as CO2

tedk-42 • Jun 26, 2022 • View on HN

Surely the methane they produce far outweighs any carbon sink benefits

jordan0day • May 2, 2014 • View on HN

I'm not at all knowledgeable in this subject, but wouldn't those methane emissions occur, regardless of if this method is used?

arcanemachiner • Apr 3, 2024 • View on HN

Methane is a 30x stronger greenhouse gas than CO2. So if 4% of the converted methane leaked into the atmosphere, you would be worse off (from a climate heating perspective) than if you had done nothing.https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/...