Assault Rifles Debate

Comments debate the differences between assault rifles like AR-15 and AK-47 versus hunting rifles, handguns, and other firearms, focusing on lethality, magazine capacity, ease of use, calibers, and regulatory distinctions.

πŸ“‰ Falling 0.3x Politics & Society
3,027
Comments
19
Years Active
5
Top Authors
#8566
Topic ID

Activity Over Time

2008
4
2009
47
2010
41
2011
43
2012
103
2013
251
2014
119
2015
159
2016
151
2017
139
2018
194
2019
456
2020
251
2021
297
2022
289
2023
183
2024
145
2025
147
2026
8

Keywords

II US G3 M9A1 DCP01305 SMG AK M249 M14 IMO rifle assault gun ar hunting 47 military accuracy 15 automatic

Sample Comments

scott_s β€’ Dec 20, 2012 β€’ View on HN

Having fired some of their weapons, I disagree that there is no difference between an AK-47 or AR-15 and a hunting rifle. Magazine size and ease of reloading make a difference. Semi-automatic weapons such as the AK-47, AR-15 or even SKS can still be manually fired at high rates, with easy reloading. They were designed for combat, not hunting, and even removing their fully-automatic capability, they're still quite effective.

gizmo β€’ May 30, 2024 β€’ View on HN

Assault rifles are rifles designed for killing humans (as opposed to hunting rifles). Sniper rifles require training. Shot guns have limited range and take long to reload. Handguns are hard to aim and not that lethal. Assault rifles are unique in that they allow an untrained teenager to shoot accurately and kill a lot of people very quickly. That’s why people want to restrict access to AR-15 type rifles.

mynameishere β€’ May 25, 2013 β€’ View on HN

The difference between a military assault rifle and a normal gun is the selective fire which allows automatic fire and semi-automatic. In the military, the type of firing that does almost all the killing is semi-automatic, just like a consumer gun. There's really nothing special about an AK-47.

toomanybeersies β€’ Mar 28, 2019 β€’ View on HN

I'd take an all-American AR-15 restricted to semi-automatic fire over a rusty old fully-automatic Afghan Kalashnikov.Not a California-spec AR-15 mind you, but a full bore, Screamin Eagle, Texas-spec AR-15, with a high capacity magazine and all the other bells and whistles.

nhangen β€’ Jan 17, 2012 β€’ View on HN

A sniper rifle would do a much better job.

jdanp β€’ Jan 9, 2021 β€’ View on HN

I think you should question your surety. Most states ban modern day assault rifle calibers for hunting deer because they are too small in diameter to do enough damage and deliver a humane kill. Hunting calibers (.308, .243 win, 30.06) are much larger and more powerful than the 5.56/5.45 the modern M4-pattern and AK74 use.In addition, per wartime regulations the worlds armies are only allowed to use FMJ which leaves a much smaller wound channel. Hunting rounds are typically soft point or

foldr β€’ Dec 3, 2019 β€’ View on HN

I said "assault rifle".

melony β€’ Aug 9, 2022 β€’ View on HN

He meant assault rifle not machine gun right?

betterunix2 β€’ Mar 17, 2021 β€’ View on HN

Not true, here is one of many counterexamples:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remington_Model_700

webmaven β€’ Jun 15, 2020 β€’ View on HN

Aren't those Swiss guns mostly rifles, rather than handguns?