Government Disaster Response

Discussions center on the effectiveness and politics of government disaster relief efforts, including skepticism toward federal aid like FEMA, comparisons to events such as Katrina and COVID-19, and debates on individual vs. official responses to natural disasters.

➡️ Stable 0.5x Politics & Society
2,411
Comments
20
Years Active
5
Top Authors
#8496
Topic ID

Activity Over Time

2007
3
2008
4
2009
12
2010
62
2011
98
2012
37
2013
93
2014
54
2015
91
2016
69
2017
332
2018
119
2019
142
2020
303
2021
169
2022
175
2023
256
2024
174
2025
217
2026
1

Keywords

US FEMA NFIP POTUS foxnews.com USA www.ijdh disaster disasters relief government supplies hurricane response natural insurance federal

Sample Comments

itchitawa Nov 12, 2013 View on HN

Now isn't the time to help. Enough governments already have relief supplies available for natural disasters so they're already helping. If you really want to help then work on protection against future disasters. People only feel like they care now because it's in the news. The ongoing vulnerability of the Phillipines to natural disasters isn't in the news and people won't care enough to help them prepare before it happens again. A sea wall last week would have been wort

monknomo Jan 13, 2025 View on HN

Natural disasters requiring emergency aid isn't really something that requires two parties scrutinizing each other, imo

comboy Feb 8, 2023 View on HN

Can anybody elaborate why? I understand if it's financial crisis or some other gov fuckup. But this is a natural disaster on an unprecedented scale, government may not have enough resources to handle it. What's the game here?

snowwrestler Sep 7, 2017 View on HN

Perhaps disaster response folks pre-positioning. Red Cross, etc.

tobeportable Nov 13, 2013 View on HN

Makes much sense for disaster relief.

throwaway48476 Oct 4, 2024 View on HN

That's fine for disaster response.

Nextgrid Jul 16, 2020 View on HN

How is this relevant to the unfolding disaster?

lonelappde Feb 2, 2020 View on HN

Considering the rapid efficient response to Katrina in New Orleans and the Hurricane Dorian in Puerto Rico (catastrophes which, unlike a new virus, are completely unpredictable in their timing of appearance and scope of impact) it's pretty clear that the US would have rapidly deployed infrastructure and supplies exactly where they needed to prevent any casualties.

noodle_face_ Feb 25, 2020 View on HN

Because there is an ongoing disaster?

Ralfp Sep 14, 2017 View on HN

I understand, but your situation is state emergency in which the very infrastructure is damaged, and not "the default" - you'll priorities will likely be different than ones people I'm targeting have and focused on recovering access to electricity/clean water, etc. ect. This will likely differ from people in so called rising markets too.