Utility Infrastructure Costs

The cluster revolves around the high costs and practical challenges of extending and maintaining physical infrastructure, particularly electricity grids, power lines, water, and sewage systems for new homes, chargers, or developments. Discussions highlight why such infrastructure is expensive compared to software scaling, involving trenching, permits, upgrades, and maintenance.

📉 Falling 0.4x Other
1,937
Comments
19
Years Active
5
Top Authors
#8315
Topic ID

Activity Over Time

2008
5
2009
9
2010
11
2011
15
2012
26
2013
33
2014
46
2015
60
2016
86
2017
94
2018
116
2019
151
2020
139
2021
227
2022
265
2023
229
2024
221
2025
194
2026
10

Keywords

ISP IF UTF8 NDT amazon.com WA i.e ERCOT infrastructure cost expensive pay maintenance electricity grid lines power utility

Sample Comments

luxurytent Jun 28, 2023 View on HN

You need to pay for all the supporting infrastructure (roads, power, fire services, etc. etc). Not that simple :)

sandworm101 Oct 9, 2021 View on HN

Try building a new house outside of a city. Look at how much it costs to run wires/pipes even a few hundred meters. Poles will cost to 10k each and you will be on the hook to maintain them. That it IF the local service has capacity for you. You might be asked to upgrade an entire service line. Today, for the same money, you can get a massive off-grid solar rig and never have to pay an electric bill.

lincon127 Mar 14, 2025 View on HN

The inefficiencies come from infrastructure. Transferring electricity is so goddamn cheap, that city planners and developers hardly consider it a footnote. Water, sewage and drainage on the other hand are much, much more expensive. They require much more space, and oft times need to be pressurized. Imagine that with steam pipes where the steam on top of all that, needs to be heated too. Sure, hooking up to an existing steam main probably doesn't cost too much, but building new mains can

ghouse Jun 9, 2019 View on HN

If you want electricity, you may be required to pay them to extend the infrastructure to your house in the middle of nowhere (at your cost) and then they are required to provide you power and maintain the infrastructure (and assume the liability). If other people begin using the infrastructure within a set period of time, you will receive partial refund for the upfront expense.

torginus Nov 28, 2025 View on HN

Not necessarily - you have to pay for that infrastructure between the plant and your home.

minitoar Nov 21, 2023 View on HN

Turns out probably not, because the grid infrastructure is quite expensive.

nradov Jul 6, 2019 View on HN

People used to working with software usually fail to appreciate how slow and expensive building real infrastructure is. It's just a lot of hard work of the "Dirty Jobs" variety. Obtain building permits. Upgrade local grids to handle the load. Dig trenches. Run cables. Install chargers. And then deal with ongoing maintenance from environmental exposure and vandalism. All of that will take years and years regardless of the potential benefits.

giantg2 Apr 18, 2022 View on HN

The outlet isn't a big deal. The infrastructure to support it is. You need to pay the supplier for additional supply lines, an electrician for the panel and other customer side infrastructure. That's the expensive part.

rootusrootus Jun 5, 2020 View on HN

My guess is the real limitation is infrastructure. Even if you already have a good power line relatively close, the cost to build something that can deliver multiple megawatts is probably not trivial. Maybe the gov't should subsidize that part.

fludlight Nov 8, 2017 View on HN

The problem isn't a lack of technology, but cost. You have to get your electric utility to make substantial improvements to their delivery infrastructure. This generally involves digging up the street and laying cables, not just flicking a switch. It gets more expensive depending on how far your proposed charging station is from the nearest high voltage distribution point.