5th Amendment Device Unlocking

Commenters debate whether government compulsion to unlock devices or provide passwords violates the Fourth and Fifth Amendments, focusing on self-incrimination and unreasonable searches.

📉 Falling 0.3x Legal
2,699
Comments
18
Years Active
5
Top Authors
#8113
Topic ID

Activity Over Time

2009
11
2010
39
2011
63
2012
78
2013
381
2014
158
2015
138
2016
195
2017
228
2018
125
2019
213
2020
126
2021
195
2022
205
2023
236
2024
160
2025
129
2026
19

Keywords

AFAIK e.g US TSA USA i.e U.S FMRI amendment 5th fifth 4th fourth rights shall violation compelled probable

Sample Comments

goffley3 • Oct 27, 2015 • View on HN

It's hard to believe something like this wouldn't fall under the fourth or fifth amendment.

sadris • Jan 27, 2019 • View on HN

There's an argument for a fifth amendment violation here.

astazangasta • May 17, 2016 • View on HN

Why doesn't the Fifth Amendment cover this?

cauterized • May 17, 2016 • View on HN

Pretty sure that's in violation of the fifth amendment (self-incrimination).

armenarmen • May 29, 2013 • View on HN

Wouldn't the 5th amendment come into play here?

netcraft • Sep 30, 2014 • View on HN

wouldn't the 5th amendment protect against that?

personjerry • Feb 12, 2017 • View on HN

It's mentioned right in the article - Fifth Amendment

hk1337 • Dec 28, 2025 • View on HN

That's their 5th amendment rights.

criddell • Sep 29, 2017 • View on HN

Not a fan of the fourth amendment?

baldfat • Feb 23, 2017 • View on HN

As a non-lawyer and not legally trained it seems like 1st amendment has nothing to do with this but 4th and 5th has everything. This is scary. It means the 4th and 5th amendment has no power with these devices?