Monsanto Seed Patents

The cluster discusses controversies around Monsanto's patents on genetically modified seeds, including lawsuits against farmers for cross-pollination contamination or saving seeds for replanting, and debates on the ethics and legality of such IP practices in agriculture.

📉 Falling 0.4x Legal
2,526
Comments
19
Years Active
5
Top Authors
#804
Topic ID

Activity Over Time

2008
1
2009
25
2010
15
2011
86
2012
138
2013
431
2014
140
2015
163
2016
220
2017
160
2018
101
2019
209
2020
131
2021
103
2022
135
2023
211
2024
120
2025
128
2026
11

Keywords

washingtonpost.com US HN www.no crops.html wikipedia.org dailymail.co AND RR seeds.org seeds monsanto farmers crops farmer seed patent patents patented crop

Sample Comments

penny500 Apr 10, 2013 View on HN

Soybean seeds aren't finite like fossil fuels. They're specially grown. If you don't want to use patented seed, don't use it. Use organic seeds if you want (and many farmers do). Otherwise, pay the IP holder. Monsanto isn't a monopoly, and you have several other GM competitors to choose from.

tartuffe78 Jan 11, 2015 View on HN

The issue in the U.S. is that flowering plants seeds travel by wind. So farmer A who bought Monsanto seeds infects farmer Bs field, who then can no longer legally harvest the seeds from field B because they contain Monsanto IP. Not sure if this applies to crops in Ghana, but its true in the US.

Oletros Jul 9, 2015 View on HN

Crop patents are older than GMO, a lot of crops and seeds are patented. Do we have to ban them?

smackay Feb 10, 2013 View on HN

The issue here is that farmers have been planting crops and saving some of the seed generated for the next season probably from Day 1 in agriculture. Monsanto seeks to insert themselves into this highly efficient process, blocking the replanting of seed and instead extracting for themselves a significant amount of money.Farmers are free to enter into this relationship since the seeds do conver some advantages in reduced use of pesticides etc. but there is a significant problem with cross-cont

cat199 Mar 15, 2017 View on HN

Though yes, I hope ultimately humanity will prevail -There are cases where farmers in adjacent plots were sued for using monsanto 'patented' plants without a licence because their crops cross-pollenated with Monsanto ones - further, if I recall correctly, Monsanto was illegally stealing crop samples or using some other form of shady tricks to perform the analysis required to determine the plants contained the 'patented' genes..Also, much like bacterial resistance in oth

throw63738 Oct 14, 2021 View on HN

GM modified seeds can not be usually replanted after harvest. Sometimes they need proprietary fertiliser.Genetic sequences are patented. There was a case where GM seeds spread to neighbours, and Monsato sued neighbour...It is horror show similar to software patents.

hobofan Jun 9, 2019 View on HN

That's not true: https://www.no-patents-on-seeds.org/en/patent-cases

doc_gunthrop Nov 2, 2019 View on HN

This sounds similar to when Monsanto tried to patent seeds and sued small farmers out of their livelihood.

unethical_ban Jan 11, 2015 View on HN

Until you cross-pollinate with Monsanto's seeds on accident, and they sue you for IP infringement.

acqq Aug 18, 2015 View on HN

It is controversial as the farmer was actually doing breeding himself 50 years using his own seeds. His actions were the actions of the breeder.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Percy_Schmeiser#Monsanto_v._Sc..."In 1997, Percy Schmeiser found Monsanto's genetically modified “Roundup Ready Canola” plants growing near his farm. He testified that he sp