Carrier Phone Subsidies

The cluster focuses on mobile carriers' practices of subsidizing phone prices through monthly contracts and fees, leading to no cost savings for users who bring their own devices or don't use carrier-provided phones.

📉 Falling 0.3x Hardware
3,328
Comments
20
Years Active
5
Top Authors
#8028
Topic ID

Activity Over Time

2007
4
2008
27
2009
101
2010
155
2011
242
2012
218
2013
235
2014
176
2015
170
2016
155
2017
146
2018
168
2019
204
2020
188
2021
209
2022
239
2023
308
2024
218
2025
147
2026
18

Keywords

GP SIM twitter.com PAYG AT TV NOT UK i.e EU contract phone pay signup monthly month cost fees sms paying

Sample Comments

Explain to me, why wouldn't this merely result in the phone companies charging higher monthly fees?

loniszczuk • Jan 21, 2011 • View on HN

Incredible. Now they charge you for NOT using your phone.

mafuy • Jul 1, 2025 • View on HN

I have to pay more when I do not use their device? Crazy...

kcb • Jan 21, 2026 • View on HN

My monthly plan payment would not go down if I brought my own phone.

ceejayoz • Jul 23, 2012 • View on HN

I imagine it's based on their pay-as-you-go plan.

csomar • Feb 13, 2017 • View on HN

Probably they have expensive contracts with carriers?

donarb • Jul 13, 2015 • View on HN

The carrier doesn't subsidize the price, its cost is amortized over the life of the contract. You are paying for the phone whether you know it or not.

thepumpkin1979 • Jun 5, 2014 • View on HN

I thought they were paying fees to Verizon.

brm • Aug 27, 2008 • View on HN

fine with that as long as its the phone users who are being charged extra to sit there.

Xylakant • Feb 3, 2013 • View on HN

I assume the GP meant that the clause was in the original contract the author signed when getting the sim-card he's currently using. That contract might have a clause to the effect that smartphone usage with that SIM costs extra.