JPEG Compression Comparisons
Discussions compare a new image compression technique to JPEG and other formats like PNG, focusing on lossiness, artifacts, efficiency, recompression effects, and resistance to distortion.
Activity Over Time
Top Contributors
Keywords
Sample Comments
Wasn't this what progressive jpeg was invented for?
Wouldn't something like image compression potentially distort this?
How does it compare to slightly lossy jpegs?
This is image compression, which uses visual tricks, not simple binary file compression
The jpeg compression argument is still valid.It's lossy compression at the core.
JPEG will not do that, but MPEG at high compression levels might.
I guess you're thinking of jpegli? Do you know how big a difference this actually makes?
Does this work for image types that use lossy-compression, or just lossless (e.g. png, tiff, etc.)?
It is more resistant to image compression, maybe that's why.
Those are probably fairly common in image compression standards - designers of image compression are not, in general, going to make their compression less efficient than it has to be. JPEG2000 in particular is likely to be far worse.