Firmware Security Concerns

The cluster centers on debates about firmware replaceability, security measures like signing and physical access requirements, potential attacks, remote updates, and legal issues such as DMCA violations.

📉 Falling 0.4x Hardware
4,127
Comments
20
Years Active
5
Top Authors
#7694
Topic ID

Activity Over Time

2007
2
2008
6
2009
8
2010
32
2011
39
2012
45
2013
87
2014
115
2015
241
2016
263
2017
222
2018
234
2019
266
2020
318
2021
353
2022
501
2023
554
2024
383
2025
428
2026
30

Keywords

USB AFAIR RS9116 HCI tehnoetic.com ROM ASIC MX6 ASUS JTAG firmware updates hardware update bootloader flashing proprietary signed blob debug

Sample Comments

z3phyr • Oct 12, 2024 • View on HN

Maybe allow others to replace the firmware with their own?

adrianN • Mar 13, 2020 • View on HN

Replacing the firmware should require physical access for security reasons imho.

galangalalgol • Mar 11, 2022 • View on HN

could you explain your firmware comment?

cmsj • Aug 6, 2014 • View on HN

Still want to know how they're mitigating firmware attacks :)

nullc • Dec 20, 2022 • View on HN

Couldn't it have been? after all they can remotely update the firmware. They just weren't in this case.

e12e • Jul 5, 2014 • View on HN

They're distributing the firmware on-line (for updates) -- why prevent reading the firmware from the chip itself?

spiderPig • Mar 27, 2018 • View on HN

Sure, but they own the firmware now though

drdaeman • Feb 19, 2014 • View on HN

Aren't firmware updates signed?

bb88 • Jan 6, 2020 • View on HN

They don't supply the firmware. The user must do that.

hsbauauvhabzb • Nov 5, 2021 • View on HN

Unless there’s a firmware back door.