LLM-Authored Article Suspicion
Commenters repeatedly accuse the linked article of being written or heavily assisted by a large language model, citing its verbose, bland, and overly polished style, while debating the implications of AI-generated content.
Activity Over Time
Top Contributors
Keywords
Sample Comments
If it's not an LLM, I guess the author spent too much time around them, because it totally reads like an LLM. And that's not a good thing.
Is it just me or this article has been written or at least heavily processed with LLM? My AI slop radar triggered immediately (overly verbose, fluff, bland). Don’t get me wrong, it has valuable information but that style smells LLM from a distance.
This was authored using an LLM, wasn't it. The style is unmistakable. Stop wasting our time with this slop.
Ironically, this post reads like it was written with an LLM.
Writing with LLMs is not a shameOrWriting with an LLM is not a shame
Did an LLM write that? It has a writing style that feels very LLM.
If you use a LLM for writing, then you aren't writing anything.
I'm not criticizing the content of the post, but it feels like it was written by a LLM. Does anyone else notice that? It screams it to me.
this works until an entire generation of people are used to reading LLM generated text and they write like an AI
This article reads as if it were written by an LLM.