Overpopulation Debate

The cluster centers on debates about human overpopulation, its effects on resources, environment, and sustainability, with arguments for reducing population growth contrasted against views that population is stabilizing or not the core issue.

📉 Falling 0.2x Politics & Society
5,504
Comments
20
Years Active
5
Top Authors
#7506
Topic ID

Activity Over Time

2007
2
2008
19
2009
43
2010
54
2011
61
2012
69
2013
175
2014
141
2015
201
2016
273
2017
295
2018
391
2019
669
2020
421
2021
781
2022
603
2023
599
2024
446
2025
242
2026
19

Keywords

youtube.com US GDP wikipedia.org population population growth growth earth human consumption birth kids reducing humans

Sample Comments

dnate Sep 28, 2020 View on HN

you may want to watch this video and check your fear of overpopulation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2LyzBoHo5EI

mclau156 Jan 27, 2025 View on HN

not a single comment about overpopulation?

rasz_pl Nov 30, 2014 View on HN

You seem to not realize those are problems for us, human virus, and not the planet problems. Those so called problems are natures way of trying to balance things. If you cut hunger and make a breakthrough in healthcare you will immediately accelerate population growth, and in effect accelerate pollution and energy use.Earth is unsustainable in the long run. No one is willing to accept euthanasia, birth limits, basically efforts to maintain population caps. People might say its a good idea oth

point78 Jun 5, 2019 View on HN

Good? We need less population, not more...

toomuchtodo Feb 25, 2024 View on HN

The argument is that more people is better. The Earth carries 8 billion people today, headed toward 10-11 billion by 2100. Why are there so many people? Unintended pregnancies. Less unintended pregnancies (empowered women, family planning, etc) constrains the pipeline of aggregate suffering (because the evidence is clear we're not going to do anything about it current state; why would we presume something would be done future state?) and human impact (less people = reduced aggregate impact

glofish Dec 9, 2019 View on HN

don't badger the man,the world (and Earth) is much better off with fewer people,it is called quorum-sensing in science, many organisms stop reproducing then they overpopulate, humanity should do the same, if it is a philosophy that is followed, so much better, everyone is better off

krunck Mar 18, 2025 View on HN

We can't keep making more people and expect the world to not change.

bart_spoon Jan 7, 2020 View on HN

That's kind of like saying that the majority of people who get cancer are old people, so we can reduce cancer rates by dying young.The issue isn't strictly overpopulation. Its overpopulation combined with the amount of consumption. You can solve this either by reducing the population, or reducing consumption, or both. For a lot of people, there are compelling ethical, economical, and personal reasons for wanting to have children or at least avoiding restricting other people's d

techrich Nov 20, 2018 View on HN

This wont be anywhere near fixed, if the worlds population keep going up. We need some event to cull the population down a bit!

iamnothere May 25, 2019 View on HN

Only if we stop producing so many people. (Good luck with that.)