Open Source Monetization

The cluster debates the ethics of accepting donations, rewards, or compensation for open source contributions, including refusals by creators, platform distributions like Brave, and concerns over monetizing others' work without ownership.

📉 Falling 0.5x Open Source
3,590
Comments
20
Years Active
5
Top Authors
#747
Topic ID

Activity Over Time

2007
12
2008
29
2009
81
2010
150
2011
170
2012
222
2013
261
2014
225
2015
154
2016
155
2017
174
2018
170
2019
219
2020
225
2021
256
2022
293
2023
290
2024
230
2025
239
2026
37

Keywords

HN archive.is ycombinator.com VLC GitHub PR API DAO DRM money godot character person offered charity project internet trying free

Sample Comments

neom • Jan 4, 2021 • View on HN

Huh? this is a random software engineer giving away his own money to try and make some impact.

timwaagh • Nov 12, 2019 • View on HN

paraphrasing: 'Getting compensated for your efforts is politically contentious, so we won't help you. But hey, we're open sourcey and stuff, so you can do it yourself. toodleydoo :) 'Look I don't really want this to fail. Would be great if streaming a video would no longer mean sending free money across the ocean. But they will have to change their attitude just a tiny bit.

hombre_fatal • May 23, 2019 • View on HN

You'd deal with the same problem if you received $100 through a donation button. People would start saying things like "I didn't pay $5 for you to take a leave of absence for a month!" or "I paid $5 and you aren't going to implement my request?"Accepting money at all is not a trivial decision.

spenvo • Mar 30, 2011 • View on HN

I had similar misgivings/feelings while using the product. However: Two observations: 1.) they did include user-selected charities lately in their distribution of "upvote" profits; 2.) The point is less about making money, more about adverse selection (keeping out trolls). Nobody could subsist off of this in any real kind of way. If they did--the value they would have to provide would be immense.

theincredulousk • Sep 27, 2017 • View on HN

Called ithttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13759157Should have charged people for it though. They need the money.

ozfive • Jul 14, 2023 • View on HN

It wasn't fair to claim that some of the $8 million should go to Godot. What I should have said was don't make claims on your site and to people supporting and using Godot or any other open source community that aren't true.This person just wants some compensation for covering the forums for Godot which sounds reasonable to me. The way it was worded wasn't clear but the underlying intention was clear.

wdiamond • Jul 24, 2016 • View on HN

if that was ironic, I would tell that some people need money but don't need to share implementations.

jonny_eh • Jul 1, 2014 • View on HN

Wouldn't that money be better spent going to a charity or a startup?

jacquesm • Nov 16, 2019 • View on HN

Don't you find it odd - to say the least - that you would offer to financially reward someone who did not author the project?

tpush • Nov 6, 2023 • View on HN

So you're trying to monetize other's contributions without giving them the right in return.