Classified Information Leaks

Discussions focus on the legality of accessing, reading, or discussing leaked classified documents, especially for individuals with security clearances, referencing WikiLeaks, Hillary Clinton's emails, and laws like 18 U.S. Code § 1924.

➡️ Stable 0.7x Legal
3,546
Comments
19
Years Active
5
Top Authors
#7308
Topic ID

Activity Over Time

2008
3
2009
17
2010
146
2011
72
2012
48
2013
484
2014
165
2015
176
2016
468
2017
191
2018
114
2019
209
2020
129
2021
251
2022
232
2023
313
2024
140
2025
368
2026
20

Keywords

RIAA www.law US IMO NSA SCIF www.fas OPENSECRET FBI UK classified information clearance documents leaked classification secret security info access

Sample Comments

jbrown Nov 21, 2014 View on HN

How is that a violation? My understanding is that it's a violation to disclose classified information. It doesn't really make any sense to prevent cleared people from reading these things because then who's going to be able to figure out the extent of the information leaked.

tssva Feb 14, 2025 View on HN

When questions about their access has arisen earlier the administration has said they were granted security clearances. Releasing classified information is in that case is potentially illegal and at a minimum was normally result in your security clearance being revoked. But these guys didn’t go through the normal processes for obtaining a security clearance, so there is no reason to believe the normal rules and laws will be followed now.

user2305832 Jun 27, 2013 View on HN

There is no exception. When Wikileaks posted its cables, the government mandated that anyone with a clearance shall not visit the websites and view the information. If it happened, it would be classified as a "data spill" which means classified info on a network with a lower classification."Data spills" sometimes result in punishment. If the mods read this comment, please return the classification to the title as it would ensure people with clearances were warned about the

petee Feb 4, 2025 View on HN

Allowed to talk about classified material? Doubtful

rdtsc Jun 29, 2013 View on HN

"secret" and "top secret" are specific classification labels that don't necessarily correspond 1 to 1 with colloquial definition of the word secret. (Kind of like maybe the word memory in a computer doesn't quite correspond to human memory even though it is the same word).Just because a set of documents are leaked, exposed, stolen, published by someone or handed over to people who are not authorized to view it, it does not automatically reset their classification

sp332 Jun 21, 2013 View on HN

It says "specifically authorized to be kept secret... and are properly classified" which seems pretty normal.

radicaldreamer Jun 28, 2013 View on HN

Certainly, there must be a state for "leaked" classified documents, for which this rule simply wouldn't apply (these leaked documents could literally appear anywhere on the web in theory).

carbocation Jul 7, 2013 View on HN

A fundamental rule of classified information is that disclosure of said information does not cause declassification. You aim to make it unclear whether there is any truth in the leaked documents to cast doubt on the information.Imagine if these were nuclear secrets. You would prefer it to be unclear so that replicating groups would not feel confident jumping into a nuclear project.Obviously since we are talking about something that may violate Amendment 4, things ought to be a bit differen

smacktoward Aug 31, 2013 View on HN

Of course they don't. That information is classified!

programmarchy Sep 6, 2014 View on HN

Sorry citizen, that's classified.