Peer Review Debate
Discussions center on whether specific scientific papers or research have undergone peer review, with debates on its necessity, reliability, and role in validating science shared on platforms like arXiv and HN.
Activity Over Time
Top Contributors
Keywords
Sample Comments
Were the papers peer reviewed? How does something like this happen
Were their papers peer reviewed? How does something like this happen.
Boy, if that isn't an argument for peer review, I don't know what is...
Has any of this been peer reviewed?
Has this gone through any peer review process?
Posting non-peer reviewed scientific papers is an anti-pattern.
Has it not been submitted to a journal and/or conference? Typically these things are peer-reviewed and tested over time, no?
This hasn't even been peer reviewed yet. Don't expect that you, the average HN reader, knows better than reviewers with relevant backgrounds.
Sorry dude, I didn't know this was a peer reviewed academic journal. I thought it was HN.
Would any peer reviewed journals accept this? Does not mean that this is wrong, but it's a pretty good signal.