Data Hoarding Debate

The cluster discusses the pros and cons of digitally hoarding old files, photos, emails, and internet content versus embracing ephemerality and deletion, debating future historical value, storage costs, privacy risks, and personal experiences.

📉 Falling 0.4x Politics & Society
2,687
Comments
20
Years Active
5
Top Authors
#7282
Topic ID

Activity Over Time

2007
3
2008
8
2009
25
2010
40
2011
59
2012
61
2013
84
2014
115
2015
88
2016
85
2017
122
2018
132
2019
285
2020
195
2021
257
2022
251
2023
363
2024
252
2025
254
2026
8

Keywords

S3 HN archive.org OK HDD TikTok YouTube VHS important past data photos archive forever old internet future information

Sample Comments

marcinreal Jul 24, 2022 View on HN

I totally understand the desire to keep a record of the past, and space is cheap so why not. I used to be a big "digital hoarder", virtually never deleting anything that might be a bit interesting. But a couple years back I deleted most, though not all of the "archive" of past me. It was a great decision that I don't regret. The important things you did will still surface from time to time. It's also always cool to accidentally find a photobucket or google docs acco

garciansmith Aug 25, 2025 View on HN

Your information lasting forever can be an issue when it's controlled by companies who exploit your data (and even short term that data can be exploited). If it's under your control than it can be quite useful. I can only see upsides to having old files and info; it is unlike too many objects which can cause issues in the physical world. That email I wrote 30 years ago in high school does no harm just sitting taking a few bytes of space. But if one day I wonder when I first read a memo

cloths Nov 13, 2023 View on HN

Yeah I also want to know this, I used to write diaries for years and cherish it, thought I would look back my life or extract something meaningful out of it, turns out I very rarely look at it.Same goes to old project archives, emails, I have both HDD and S3 Glacier for them, but so far I have never looked at them at all, for 10 years, And I doubt I will look at them in another 10 years.I am beginning to thinking Letting past go and You aren't gonna need it philosophy towards such thi

shantara Apr 13, 2020 View on HN

I don't understand the negativity the article associates with "hoarding" data.It is the nature of the internet that any content or website you see can disappear at any moment without a prior warning or an explanation. From an author deleting their earlier work they were later dissatisfied with, to copyright claims, to people losing interest in their hobby project, to site owner forgetting to extend their domain, to website becoming impossible to find in search engines.It alw

pbhjpbhj May 9, 2015 View on HN

I wonder - looking at the data they have now - how much of the data stored has never been used by ordinary users. There's got to be a lot of cruft that could be trimmed. In the past people would keep letters they felt were important. Now, with the network it's hard to tell what's important, a user might prune items that other users want to keep or might prune items that later become more important. Is there really enough value in keeping everything.I'm a consumate hoarder,

kaxline Apr 4, 2019 View on HN

My thinking is that you just don't know what will be important to you in the future. Those photos probably weren't that important to you when they were first taken, but now they are. I would advise that everyone store even the seemingly most trivial piece of data. There could be an algorithm in the future for which that is the missing key. I trust in our inability to predict the future more than our ability to predict it.

32gbsd Nov 25, 2022 View on HN

Keeping old stuff is hard af in a internet run by walled gardens

enumjorge Dec 11, 2019 View on HN

Not only that, but I also wonder if we're overestimating the value of keeping all of this data around. Who's going to have the time to search and curate these mountains of information when we're generating tons more of it every day? I imagine the ideal goal is to allow future historians to learn about our past selves, but I think there's a tipping point where only those with lots of resources can afford to meaningfully consume it. Those typically are wealthy companies or indi

bhelkey Jan 31, 2022 View on HN

Recording isn't knowing but archiving is better than losing.As an exercise, look back at bookmarks that are 5+ years old. How many of them still load? Look back at your history of liked videos on YouTube. How many of them have been deleted?

tifadg1 Mar 25, 2021 View on HN

Indeed. Of all the information I'm inadvertently exposed during the day, there's maybe 1 piece that's worth remembering tomorrow - maybe. I bet I'm with the absolute majority in this case as well.In fact I've started the habit of deleting everything after a period of inactivity - be it computer history or social history - because it's either important and saved properly or it's not.Certainly the world wouldn't loose heritage if random blogs, facebook