Qualified Immunity

This cluster revolves around discussions of qualified immunity, a U.S. legal doctrine protecting government officials like police from civil lawsuits for rights violations, including explanations, criticisms, examples, and calls for reform or abolition.

πŸ“‰ Falling 0.4x Legal
1,582
Comments
18
Years Active
5
Top Authors
#7263
Topic ID

Activity Over Time

2008
1
2010
8
2011
19
2012
37
2013
61
2014
30
2015
39
2016
24
2017
35
2018
37
2019
43
2020
303
2021
208
2022
153
2023
281
2024
128
2025
155
2026
20

Keywords

US theappeal.org CRIMINAL SCOTUS reason.com QI wikisource.org wikipedia.org NASA qualified immunity immunity qualified police government courts state government officials lawsuits law

Sample Comments

fortran77 β€’ Sep 29, 2025 β€’ View on HN

What you're thinking of is "qualified immunity" and that protects individuals--govermenment offcials--from being sued when carrying out duties related to their jobs.See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qualified_immunity

billme β€’ May 30, 2020 β€’ View on HN

Related Wiki page on Qualified Immunity:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qualified_immunity

Eddy_Viscosity2 β€’ Jun 26, 2022 β€’ View on HN

Most likely you can't because of "qualified immunity" wherein government officials can violate rights of people and face no consequences.

Schiendelman β€’ Dec 29, 2021 β€’ View on HN

Don’t those officers still have qualified immunity?

hnick β€’ Jun 4, 2020 β€’ View on HN

Qualified immunity is qualified, not absolute.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qualified_immunity"Qualified immunity is a legal doctrine in United States federal law that shields government officials from being sued for discretionary actions performed within their official capacity, unless their actions violated "clearly established" federal law or constitutiona

dredmorbius β€’ Jun 5, 2020 β€’ View on HN

An excellent Qualified Immunity explainer:https://theappeal.org/qualified-immunity-explained/

ghastmaster β€’ Aug 12, 2023 β€’ View on HN

Qualified immunity does not protect government employees who break the law. There are laws/rulings that specifically disqualify them from using qualified immunity as a defense. The problem is prosecutors, judges, and juries who allow government employees to commit illegal actions with no consequences. This is furthered by citizens who pay no attention and let these people stay in power.

giantg2 β€’ Jun 3, 2020 β€’ View on HN

The SCOTUS ruling that created qualified immunity only applies to government workers such as police and politicians, so the answer to your question would be "none".

twright β€’ Oct 17, 2023 β€’ View on HN

I think your comment is the only one here mentioning qualified immunity. This is definitely another qualified immunity case disguised as a free speech case, I'd expect the outcome to be similar on that alone. Until qualified immunity for police is done away with, police essentially have carte-blanche to do what they want without consequence (barring extraordinary incidents of violence).

fortran77 β€’ Apr 1, 2023 β€’ View on HN

You can't. "Qualified Immunity".It would be nice, of course, if a good Qualified Immunity case hit our current SCOTUS. They may rule differently than past courts, if they're as principled as they purport to be.