Sparta Myths Debunked

The cluster centers on debates about the overhyped reputation of ancient Sparta as superior warriors, challenging popular myths with historical analysis from sources like Thucydides, Herodotus, and modern critiques highlighting biases and propaganda.

📉 Falling 0.3x Politics & Society
1,977
Comments
20
Years Active
5
Top Authors
#7223
Topic ID

Activity Over Time

2007
3
2008
4
2009
18
2010
15
2011
18
2012
15
2013
31
2014
25
2015
67
2016
72
2017
99
2018
108
2019
198
2020
157
2021
366
2022
190
2023
255
2024
190
2025
142
2026
4

Keywords

BBC tufts.edu WW2 ycombinator.com MetaFilter laphamsquarterly.org DFS smithsonianmag.com youtube.com metafilter.com war greeks ancient military greek sea slave does want accounts reputation

Sample Comments

Kednicma Aug 26, 2020 View on HN

Congratulations, you've fallen for ancient propaganda. Educate yourself [0][1][2] and don't have weird links in your profile.[0] https://acoup.blog/2019/08/16/collections-this-isnt-sparta-p...[1] https://en.wikiped

baud147258 Oct 31, 2019 View on HN

Isn't the military might of Sparta an example of history written by the losers? I mean one important source for the Peloponnesian War was Thucydides, who was on the losing side of the war. And when writing his book, he might have wanted to cast himself in the best light possible, by depicting his victorious opponents as the best military in Greece?

ciupicri Apr 14, 2009 View on HN

Speaking of Greeks and Homer, let's not forget the Spartans and their custom of killing disabled children.

arisAlexis Sep 30, 2021 View on HN

I don't understand the point of the article. In quantitative terms one can say that Y was better than X. Like: Usa in the 20th century was better at creating technology. Why does the author need to emphasize that Spartans were no better than other Greeks as warriors as it's a bad thing? It's not discimination or racism or whatever. I think it's because in modern times saying Y is better than X is bad. Except for in sports. Weird.

mrec Oct 30, 2019 View on HN

For anyone interested in this, I'd highly recommend /u/Iphikrates' three-part summary of the Spartan reputational mirage on /r/AskHistorians a couple of years ago.https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/6rvusy/is_th...

brenainn Feb 19, 2025 View on HN

I read this previously and from memory it relies a lot on what Athens wrote about Sparta? I'm no historian but I was wondering if there's bias there, because they mostly despised each other and Athens kept records whereas Sparta didn't. It seems reasonable that you'd write a bunch of stuff about your enemies being inhumane and generally shit. Maybe the sometimes nicer things written about them coincided with periods of peace and alliance? Just spit balling, it's still an

tonymet Aug 26, 2025 View on HN

why Herodotus? Why Thucydides ?

moonshotideas Sep 26, 2025 View on HN

The story of Athens as told by Sparta

C1sc0cat Nov 4, 2019 View on HN

I Would take Thucydides over Herodotus any day

drannex Aug 8, 2023 View on HN

And not exactly about the same link, but same concept:The sea people: Alexander the Great trod in the footsteps of forgotten Greeks: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29449160