Fiber Internet Deployment

Discussions center on the challenges, costs, and economics of deploying fiber optic internet to homes (FTTH), especially comparing rural vs. urban areas, profitability for ISPs, and the role of municipal or co-op providers.

πŸ“‰ Falling 0.4x DevOps & Infrastructure
4,586
Comments
20
Years Active
5
Top Authors
#7138
Topic ID

Activity Over Time

2007
4
2008
13
2009
32
2010
51
2011
83
2012
102
2013
158
2014
326
2015
255
2016
273
2017
358
2018
286
2019
333
2020
466
2021
397
2022
410
2023
410
2024
331
2025
286
2026
12

Keywords

e.g IT US CPE FTTX DPI ATT LEO FTTB HN fiber rural areas city rural areas copper cable fibre poles telephone

Sample Comments

toomuchtodo β€’ Sep 21, 2018 β€’ View on HN

Most Americans won't have fiber to the premises unless a local muni provider rolls it out. It's very expensive, and most incumbent ILECs gave up on it (See: Verizon->Frontier). "Should" is dependent on cost recovery of trenching, labor, and equipment costs.

swalsh β€’ Jan 17, 2018 β€’ View on HN

I think this is more common in rural area where it's not economically feasible to run fiber to everyone.

ls612 β€’ Oct 14, 2023 β€’ View on HN

Don’t most people in major metro areas have fiber options now? (Municipal or not)

AngryData β€’ Jul 22, 2025 β€’ View on HN

Fiber should be the goal for everyone. Fiber is cheaper and lighter than copper which is why rural areas that haven't had any internet options except 56k on old degraded lines or satellite are finally now getting high speed internet the last few years, usually through co-op fiber startups. It can be hung on power poles, it can be installed with a trencher, and now that horizontal boring machines are incredibly common it can be put under existing infrastructure very easily.

lotsofpulp β€’ May 24, 2022 β€’ View on HN

Because installing fiber wires to every residence is not profitable when the local coaxial cable company can give everyone low quality 500Mbps down / 3Mbps up connections for $45 per month. It is why you usually only see fiber in brand new developments where there is no additional cost to bury it while everything is already excavated for all the other utilities, or in older neighborhoods with overhead wires where it is cheaper to install.If you are in a relatively modern area with burie

nicoburns β€’ Oct 20, 2020 β€’ View on HN

Not in cities where there is cheap fibre available. But in rural areas it can definitely be like this. It's at least partly because the government ordered our national telecom provider to halt their fibre rollout in the 80s/90s because it deemed it anti-competitive. It's still catching up for lost time.

bayindirh β€’ Sep 22, 2020 β€’ View on HN

There might be fiber running up the village.If the speed doesn't saturate DSL or coax standards, running fiber to every home is not very wise, even for long term.Until recently, fiber was not even that cheap to distribute in larger cities. It's been 3-4 years since the city I live in switched to FTTX distribution.

system2 β€’ Dec 11, 2023 β€’ View on HN

Maybe bring fiber to major cities before giving select customers terabyte connections?

monochr β€’ Jul 10, 2014 β€’ View on HN

No. It's about nit needing to rip out whole buildings to put in fiber to the plug. They say it in the article.

AngryData β€’ Nov 23, 2025 β€’ View on HN

Its not like it is some monumental task. Fiber is cheaper than copper, and we managed to lay copper telephone lines and power lines to everybody. Where I live right now didn't even have DSL available at any point in time, the local telecomm didn't want to spend money on replacing some of the poorly functioning 60 year old copper lines despite everyone clamoring for any kind of wired connection. And yet a startup ISP managed to not only lay down gigabit direct to home fiber to the entir