Unicode Emoji Support
The cluster focuses on discussions about emojis as part of the Unicode standard, their technical implementation, support in fonts and applications, rendering issues (e.g., on Hacker News), and debates on whether they constitute bloat or drive better Unicode adoption.
Activity Over Time
Top Contributors
Keywords
Sample Comments
There is more to unicode than emoji. That's why i phrased it the way I did.
It's not only for emoji, it's also for less common scripts.
Unicode can be useful. The emoji subset generally are not.
Your Unicode tables must be out-of-date. Emoji's been in Unicode for a while now.
Like it or not: in the era of Unicode, emoji's are plaintext.
Emojis are just Unicode characters, why would it be so hard?
Weren't Unicode emojis designed to replace image emoticons?
So, am I right in my understanding that this is meant to add support for emojis not present in UTF8?
Emoji is the mistake that will kill Unicode mark my words.
Emoji's are part of Unicode. Not bloat.