SCOTUS Decisions and Precedents
The cluster centers on debates about US Supreme Court (SCOTUS) rulings, including recent decisions overturning precedents like Roe v. Wade and Chevron deference, criticisms of ideological bias, and the court's respect for stare decisis.
Activity Over Time
Top Contributors
Keywords
Sample Comments
The US supreme court seems to disagree with you.
Recent SCOTUS actions disprove your point.
Ask the SCOTUS. It was their interpretation.
The Supreme Court of the United States disagrees with you.
Supremely court decisions, I think.
Has SCOTUS ever later revisited and reversed a previous decision?
The current SCOTUS? Respecting your rights? I wouldn’t count on it, friend.
I would argue the us supreme court is already doing that
Showed? You mean "argues", right? This has been case law via the Supreme Court for over fifty years, and only because the court is currently so thoroughly packed with a singular ideology is it getting considered again.
And these justifications from previous decisions (Obergefell, Loving etc… ) can be overturned with the current SCOTUS’s interpretation. In-fact, in the leaked draft, these were also on the docket to be targeted by the court. In todays assent, only Obergefell is being targeted. I wonder why that is? (Cough, Clarence Thomas)