GitHub Repo Licenses

Comments focus on inquiring about, identifying, or complaining about the absence of license information in GitHub repositories for open source projects, often requesting additions like MIT or Apache licenses.

➡️ Stable 0.5x Open Source
5,898
Comments
20
Years Active
5
Top Authors
#6516
Topic ID

Activity Over Time

2007
2
2008
18
2009
53
2010
77
2011
132
2012
219
2013
272
2014
288
2015
331
2016
333
2017
310
2018
264
2019
288
2020
373
2021
451
2022
611
2023
599
2024
620
2025
615
2026
42

Keywords

MPL IMHO LIC HashiCorp OpenTofu LICENSE GeoLite MIT OSI creativecommons.org license mit repo github hashicorp licensed copyright code open source plausible

Sample Comments

bratsche • Aug 23, 2015 • View on HN

What's the license on this? There doesn't seem to be anything about that in their Github repo.

hugs • Dec 23, 2016 • View on HN

What's the license? (I don't see any explicitly mentioned in the source repo.)

simonmales • Nov 12, 2014 • View on HN

No mention of which license they are using?

pgaddict • Dec 21, 2016 • View on HN

Sadly, no info about license in the github repository ...

verdverm • Nov 15, 2020 • View on HN

What's up with the license / copyright for this repo?

toomanyducks • Apr 20, 2021 • View on HN

What's the license? I didn't see it on the repo.

jacooper • Apr 15, 2023 • View on HN

At least its mention code license. See github, its actually possible!

simcop2387 • Jun 8, 2021 • View on HN

It looks like it's Apache 2.0 licensed? Wh issues do you have with that licemse.

iqandjoke • May 27, 2025 • View on HN

License type is needed. Something like GPLv3/ WTFPL Do What The Fuck You Want To Public License?

Cthulhu_ • Nov 2, 2017 • View on HN

It's an open source project though, MIT license.