Glasses-Free 3D Displays

Commenters debate the authenticity and effectiveness of a showcased glasses-free 3D display or video, questioning if it delivers true stereoscopic depth and comparing it to failed 3D TVs and headache-inducing movies that require glasses.

📉 Falling 0.3x Hardware
2,521
Comments
20
Years Active
5
Top Authors
#6477
Topic ID

Activity Over Time

2007
1
2008
11
2009
50
2010
238
2011
201
2012
95
2013
127
2014
127
2015
80
2016
113
2017
308
2018
105
2019
79
2020
116
2021
178
2022
157
2023
231
2024
175
2025
121
2026
8

Keywords

TV VR UI IMAX 3d 2d glasses movies watching movie images eye entertainment dune

Sample Comments

tibbydudeza • Dec 19, 2022 • View on HN

Reminds of 3D TV which fizzled out because folks don't want to wear glasses.

ccozan • Feb 21, 2013 • View on HN

maybe 3D vision without glasses?

sbmassey • Nov 24, 2017 • View on HN

I'm short sighted in one eye, so my brain doesn't really resolve the different images into a cohesive feeling of solidity, so 3D is wasted on me.

choppaface • May 15, 2015 • View on HN

Seriously, do people consider this 3D video?

wtetzner • Jan 10, 2014 • View on HN

So you'd need to wear 3D glasses :)

edgy • Apr 12, 2011 • View on HN

dont be fooled, this is not 3D as in "stereoscopic" 3D like avatar. You will not get the feeling of depth because for that you need a different image for each eye (only achieved with glasses or a special screen (like 3DS or at the movies). This is just a 3D geometry trick...

jamesbritt • Jan 16, 2009 • View on HN

Interesting, though not actually "3D movies".

Tepix • Dec 20, 2024 • View on HN

You eyes provide decent 3d, don't they?

tallanvor • Jan 7, 2016 • View on HN

Interesting to know. I still won't buy one until I can actually try it out, but it sounds like it's better than 3D movies, which I cannot watch without getting a splitting headache (I think it's due to the decreased light levels that come through the glasses).

alanh • Apr 23, 2011 • View on HN

No more than 3D glasses (which do)!