Smartphone Camera Quality

The cluster discusses smartphone camera performance, particularly iPhone vs. Pixel and dedicated cameras, focusing on photo quality, software processing, hardware limitations, and comparisons in low light and dynamic range.

📉 Falling 0.3x Hardware
3,817
Comments
19
Years Active
5
Top Authors
#6380
Topic ID

Activity Over Time

2008
2
2009
19
2010
31
2011
99
2012
91
2013
115
2014
121
2015
86
2016
198
2017
248
2018
180
2019
267
2020
329
2021
303
2022
552
2023
562
2024
257
2025
346
2026
11

Keywords

theverge.com DO S22 TPU youtube.com NR GPU HDR AI JPEG iphone camera photos picture phone dynamic range cameras lens phones pixel

Sample Comments

rvnx Jul 29, 2023 View on HN

Great result! Sad however, that the iPhone takes really poor photos by default without additional software :/ (iPhone 14 Pro is super blurry)

emkoemko Sep 15, 2022 View on HN

if you want image quality you will not find it in phones... this is a limitation of psychics

miohtama Jan 25, 2020 View on HN

Looks like camera is open. I wonder if it possible to tweak software to get unholy quality out of sensors like Pixel phones do, or does one need to have high power/integrated GPU or TPU hardware for it.

damnyou Aug 3, 2020 View on HN

Have you tried Pixels? To my taste the photos they take are a couple notches better than iPhones.

dragonbonheur Oct 20, 2015 View on HN

I'd blame the photographer rather than the phone here. Learn to use lighting and exposure settings properly. Experiment. Take several shots of the same place with different settings until you get it right. Learn picture composition. The first and the last picture seem good so it's not the phone.

hnuser123456 Jul 30, 2025 View on HN

All these photos also seem to be taken at a further distance at a higher zoom with the digicam. Use 2x mode on iphone and step back a bit and the perspective/distortion should be similar. 12mp is still plenty. Also, they didn't mention if they turned off face smoothing on the iphone.Google a couple years ago, however, made a big stink that they were forcing an always-on filter to "enhance" the appearance of dark skin on Pixels, so yeah you might need a real camera to get a

m3kw9 Oct 31, 2023 View on HN

wouldn't get the low light and dynamic range, if you've ever used an iphone to take pics 8 years ago

thefounder Sep 19, 2019 View on HN

I guess that's a feature..plus the iPhone camera seems a joke in comparison with mate pro.

jlarocco Jan 31, 2023 View on HN

I didn't see any invented "new details" in the article's iPhone photos. Phones have small sensors and crap lenses, so they ramp up noise reduction and sharpness to make up for it. Turn up the ISO and max out the NR on the Fujifilm and the results would be nearly as bad.

obarthelemy Dec 15, 2020 View on HN

There are phones with similar pic quality. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bcJs_KrPh8A