Art Market Critique

Discussions center on the perceived artificiality and sham nature of the high-end art market, where prices are driven by branding, provenance, galleries, money laundering, and speculation rather than intrinsic artistic value or skill.

📉 Falling 0.4x Politics & Society
3,815
Comments
20
Years Active
5
Top Authors
#6196
Topic ID

Activity Over Time

2007
3
2008
8
2009
40
2010
56
2011
39
2012
92
2013
155
2014
88
2015
197
2016
144
2017
166
2018
365
2019
266
2020
287
2021
572
2022
410
2023
343
2024
275
2025
294
2026
15

Keywords

AI bloombergview.com GAN theswisstimes.ch ycombinator.com DALLE WILL IRS art artist artists artwork value paintings money worth tax painting

Sample Comments

Grakel Jan 8, 2022 View on HN

Maybe art is worth its market rate.

lostcolony Sep 24, 2021 View on HN

The art world is definitely a sham(1). That doesn't mean there isn't money making opportunity, nor does it mean there isn't intrinsic value in artwork; if anything it tends to mean there are outsized winners and losers that are divorced from any intrinsic value of the art.(1)Consider all the artists "unrecognized" during their lifetime; did their genius just get discovered after their deaths? No, it was just at that point their works were a limited commodity, and not

massa Aug 25, 2009 View on HN

Because people don't value who makes art, they value who sells art.

beardyw Sep 13, 2021 View on HN

High end art by dead artists mainly. Newly created art benefits the gallery and artist (in that order)

jasonshen Apr 10, 2020 View on HN

My wife is a designer-turned-artist so I'm familiar with some of the comments above re: solo shows / the value of galleries. If you've read "The Case for the 12 Million Dollar Shark" then you must know that most people who buy art at high prices are wealthy, upper class folks who see art as much as a way to show off how cool / sophisticated they are and as an investment vehicle.I've personally found the entire industry off putting at how much it's about

koziserek Apr 15, 2022 View on HN

it will stick, I suppose. Perfect thing to supersede high art sales for money loundering/tax optimisation etc

queuebert Jul 7, 2021 View on HN

Are you telling me the art market is artificial!?

CompanionCubee Sep 11, 2021 View on HN

That's kind of how high priced artwork works too.

joe_the_user Oct 21, 2013 View on HN

The whole "high-art = big money" mindset is what ruins everything. Just let it be. It's an image that people enjoy looking at, and it's right there for everyone to see - touchable, fragile, transient.I agree but I'd like to point out that Banksy is as much a part of the "high-art = big money" as the galleries and the press.

vinceguidry May 26, 2015 View on HN

I don't think it's quite accurate to call the participants charlatans / fools. The pieces are presented as clearly ripped off of Instagram, the last bit of the comment thread preserved along with one of the artist's. The people buying the prints know exactly what they are, it's difficult to maintain the position that they're getting ripped off.Art's a weird world. White canvases have sold for many millions:<a href="http://www.bloombergview.com&#