Satellite Orbits Debate

Comments discuss comparisons between low Earth orbit (LEO) satellite constellations like Starlink and geostationary (GEO) satellites, questioning practicality, coverage, latency, line-of-sight requirements, and the need for large numbers of satellites.

πŸ“‰ Falling 0.4x Science
5,933
Comments
20
Years Active
5
Top Authors
#610
Topic ID

Activity Over Time

2007
1
2008
3
2009
16
2010
56
2011
44
2012
80
2013
83
2014
194
2015
199
2016
255
2017
230
2018
499
2019
538
2020
611
2021
694
2022
729
2023
559
2024
611
2025
462
2026
71

Keywords

ExoAnalytics N.B ITU GEO ICBM UN GPS LEO satellites orbit satellite leo orbits latency geo mars tracking coverage

Sample Comments

f6v β€’ Apr 29, 2021 β€’ View on HN

Can't you do that with simple satellites?

rpeden β€’ Jan 3, 2019 β€’ View on HN

Maybe they're using telecom satellites that are in geosynchronous orbit?

mattr47 β€’ Jan 21, 2022 β€’ View on HN

Starlink satellites are in LEO, not geostationary.

vkuruthers β€’ Jul 23, 2016 β€’ View on HN

How is this practical & cost effective vs. satellites?

s_y_n_t_a_x β€’ Apr 9, 2019 β€’ View on HN

What about low orbit satellites?

someguydave β€’ Sep 8, 2022 β€’ View on HN

globalstar uses LEO satellites which are in constant motion, there is no way that you must point at them to make these features work

sabujp β€’ Sep 21, 2018 β€’ View on HN

the only solution to this is to launch your own satellites :)

tehjoker β€’ Oct 6, 2025 β€’ View on HN

i still don’t understand why we need huge constellations of satellites at all

rsl7 β€’ Apr 27, 2010 β€’ View on HN

Whose satellites are they using?

ziggyzecat β€’ Oct 8, 2024 β€’ View on HN

you'd want what exactly? 10 times more small satellites in the {or}bits (i never noticed ...)?