Appeasement Policy Criticism

Comments debate the dangers and historical failures of appeasement strategies, drawing parallels to WWII events like Chamberlain's policies and the Munich Agreement in the context of modern geopolitical aggression.

📉 Falling 0.5x Politics & Society
1,242
Comments
19
Years Active
5
Top Authors
#6002
Topic ID

Activity Over Time

2007
1
2009
3
2010
8
2011
12
2012
14
2013
25
2014
19
2015
25
2016
43
2017
41
2018
52
2019
60
2020
65
2021
113
2022
295
2023
118
2024
150
2025
175
2026
23

Keywords

NATO US WW2 en.m UK WWI MAD wikipedia.org war worked british peace landing history argentina hitler dictator ends

Sample Comments

reducesuffering • Apr 14, 2022 • View on HN

Not our fight? Have you heard of Chamberlain?https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeasement

77pt77 • Nov 21, 2019 • View on HN

Appeasement doesn't work, but there's definitely a price to pay.

jwineinger • Jul 7, 2022 • View on HN

Appeasement has been tried before, to great loss.

MichaelMoser123 • Nov 10, 2023 • View on HN

the author of the question has a strong opinion against such a step, that he calls "appeasement". See his answers when asked for his reasons.

TheLoafOfBread • Feb 20, 2023 • View on HN

This is called appeasement. It did not worked in 1930s, it is not going to work today.

Like what? Appeasement hasn't worked well historically.

isbvhodnvemrwvn • Feb 27, 2022 • View on HN

I see that you're the fan of appeasement strategy. Worked out well for France and the UK in the past.

Hikikomori • Jan 5, 2026 • View on HN

Surely appeasement will work this time

Zigurd • Dec 28, 2024 • View on HN

Not appeasement. That's been tried.

jevgeni • Jun 28, 2021 • View on HN

A Brit saying that we should appease a violent dictator in hopes they’ll be less violent. Hmm…