Movie Distribution Rights

The cluster discusses legal and business challenges in movie distribution, contrasting physical media rentals under the first sale doctrine with restrictive digital streaming licenses, content availability issues, and studio control over releases to combat piracy.

📉 Falling 0.3x Legal
3,238
Comments
20
Years Active
5
Top Authors
#5900
Topic ID

Activity Over Time

2007
4
2008
18
2009
68
2010
105
2011
146
2012
260
2013
143
2014
234
2015
122
2016
140
2017
196
2018
197
2019
297
2020
166
2021
194
2022
293
2023
266
2024
217
2025
169
2026
3

Keywords

e.g www.bfi US DVD MPAA SOPA org.uk CISPA oldies.com IP movie movies netflix rights dvd film watch studios rent stream

Sample Comments

d1zzy Apr 5, 2019 View on HN

The first sale doctrine protects this business model so even if all studios stop all rental contracts with you, you can still legally purchase retail discs and rent those out. Unfortunately there is no such thing for streaming.

rhino369 Feb 5, 2015 View on HN

Piracy is the reason you can't stream a movie the day it comes out. Movie theaters are the best DRM available.

cmiles74 Mar 11, 2014 View on HN

In my opinion, the real issue is more along the lines of "How do I purchase and watch a film that I would like to see." The solutions are many and varied, but none provides access to all of the films one might want to watch. A given film may never be available in a theater near you and once they leave, may never become available online (via Netflix, iTunes, etc.) Just like the record companies, the production houses are hoping that if they fight progress long and hard enough, people wi

abnry Jul 13, 2020 View on HN

Just get a DVD/Blueray player. The content is there for you to legally get and pay for. Heck, you can buy pretty much any movie from Amazon digitally. There is really no excuse not to pay.

Mountain_Skies Feb 8, 2023 View on HN

That's almost certainly a rights issue. Even if legal, movie studios probably wouldn't be happy about not getting a cut of the action and would stop releasing movies to that theater. Which is too bad because it seems like there could be a system where you can select from a studio's library of past releases and pay a fee for viewing. Just like their opposition to VCRs which ended up greatly improving their bottom line instead of killing them off like "the Boston Strangler"

isbvhodnvemrwvn Aug 12, 2021 View on HN

The copyright applies to a specific viewing of a movie, not the purchase of a license. They can't enable their users to break license or they'll loose their right to distribute content.

leipie Feb 6, 2025 View on HN

Maybe they are republishing the movies in the cheapest way to keep the rights?

gerikson Mar 30, 2021 View on HN

You can resell the rights to watch that no-longer-available movie to someone else...

infogulch Apr 7, 2019 View on HN

You don't need any special rights to rent out physical copies of movies. Video stores, Netflix, Redbox all could just buy disks and tapes from the local market and rent them out directly. Sure, they can make a business deal to get better pricing and cut out the middleman, but this effectively puts a cap on that negotiation because the local market is always a fallback. When streaming deals fail there is no fallback, see Netflix's depleting catalog.The problem is that the experien

xeromal Feb 20, 2022 View on HN

It could be in their agreements to sell movies on google play, youtube, etc. e.g. A financial reason to make the MPAA happy.