3D Printed Guns

Discussions focus on the feasibility, safety issues such as accidental discharges, and regulatory challenges of 3D-printed or plastic firearms, including comparisons to traditional guns, smart guns like BioFire, and improvised weapons.

➡️ Stable 0.7x Hardware
3,548
Comments
20
Years Active
5
Top Authors
#567
Topic ID

Activity Over Time

2007
1
2008
6
2009
27
2010
63
2011
35
2012
127
2013
250
2014
121
2015
216
2016
135
2017
196
2018
218
2019
212
2020
189
2021
318
2022
314
2023
351
2024
298
2025
462
2026
9

Keywords

US CartridgeComparison.jpg youtu.be CartridgeComparison youtube.com popularmechanics.com twitter.com SMASH en.m YouTube gun firing barrel bullet weapon plastic shoot rounds guns rifle

Sample Comments

ars Nov 13, 2014 View on HN

The bullet is still metal though, and not 3D printed, all they have to do is regulate the bullet instead of the gun.

jotm Mar 5, 2020 View on HN

Seriously, a cheap flintlock pistol/rifle replica (which you can easily buy and modify to actually work) would be safer for the user than that thing.

bastawhiz Aug 16, 2025 View on HN

Nobody is talking about the gun firing when the trigger is pulled. The gun is firing when the trigger is explicitly not pulled. Even if you're talking about the video the parent comment linked, the very first few seconds of the video show the gun discharging without a finger anywhere near the trigger. That's a deadly design flaw that in any other industry should have resulted in a full recall. Here, it was known and covered up while innocent people who made no operational error were ma

noonespecial May 3, 2013 View on HN

Remember that a hammer and a pair of pliers is also a "gun" if you happen to have a bullet. Its dangerous to fire, hard to aim, and has a very low muzzle velocity, but it does meet the criteria.

vaksel Apr 30, 2009 View on HN

It wouldn't work anyways, people would just make their own bullets.

Vecr Apr 8, 2023 View on HN

Yeah, firing a gun into the dirt is much safer. If you have a giggle switch make sure you can handle the recoil, otherwise you might shoot yourself or someone else in the foot.

eigenvalue May 27, 2023 View on HN

I don't own a gun (I've never even shot a gun before), but I came across this video on YouTube and I'm really impressed with how thoughtfully this BioFire gun was designed. If I did ever purchase a gun, I think for sure I'd insist on something like this, since the main risk seems to be your kids finding it or an attacker overpowering you and shooting you with your own gun, both of which would be prevented by this. Also you don't have to worry about someone stealing the g

deschutes Jul 27, 2024 View on HN

It's a creative thought but this kind of thinking is in direct contradiction to the widely accepted principles of safe firearm handling. Trying to mitigate the damage of negligent discharges is the wrong problem to solve. In this case it sounds like the negligence may belong to the manufacturer in which case these weapons should be scrapped.

kappuchino Oct 22, 2021 View on HN

Additional info via https://twitter.com/winkelsdorf/status/1451439068861116421 (translated, a little condensed): In order to use blanks, the weapon has to be modified because of reduced pressure from the blanks. Otherwise the weapon would not reload (think machinegun that only can do one shot you see the reason). The modification depends on the type of weapon

toomuchtodo Dec 18, 2014 View on HN

The same way you fire a plastic gun without it compromising its integrity:http://www.wired.com/2014/05/3d-printed-guns/