National ID Debate

Discussions center on the need for government-backed national ID systems, especially in the US, comparing fragmented current identifiers like SSNs and driver's licenses to unified digital IDs in countries like Estonia and Colombia, while debating privacy, surveillance, fraud prevention, and political resistance.

➡️ Stable 0.9x Politics & Society
4,659
Comments
20
Years Active
5
Top Authors
#5410
Topic ID

Activity Over Time

2007
2
2008
9
2009
12
2010
23
2011
52
2012
35
2013
67
2014
93
2015
96
2016
139
2017
329
2018
172
2019
249
2020
303
2021
543
2022
553
2023
470
2024
579
2025
887
2026
46

Keywords

e.g US estonia.com SSN PIN worldprivacyforum.org UI ballotpedia.org AFAIK theatlantic.com id government identity ids national digital passport card social security passports

Sample Comments

teucris Dec 14, 2023 View on HN

Humans! We rely on nation states for root identity - social security numbers and birth certificates in the US - which are then used to get further identification credentials, eg drivers licenses, mailing addresses, passports, etc. These are easily defrauded, lots of mistakes are made, and are dependent on the nation’s government for support and reliability. Imagine those systems required no government bureaucracy, couldn’t be revoked, proved you were a human, etc. Wouldn’t that be a benefit?

mr_overalls Aug 6, 2019 View on HN

Exactly. We need a free national ID card - like the vast majority of countries in the world.https://www.worldprivacyforum.org/2017/07/national-ids-aroun...

tokyodude Jan 7, 2019 View on HN

do we need government backed id? is there no other solution?

toomuchtodo Dec 19, 2023 View on HN

You’re default fucked anyway current state based on this anecdote. Broadly speaking, government should make it as straightforward as possible to obtain a legitimate government credential from an equity perspective for a variety of lifetime identity needs (and about 1% of the US population has no government ID). Out of 200 countries, 170 have a national ID system.<a href="https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2021/08/voting-rights-national-id-card/

panstromek Sep 28, 2025 View on HN

I don't understand the problem. How is this different from all other identifiers, physical or digital, that most goverments already have?

toomuchtodo Aug 12, 2019 View on HN

Someone, somewhere, in US government needs to push for the same system Estonia uses for their national ID card.https://e-estonia.com/solutions/e-identity/id-card/

adriancr Jun 1, 2021 View on HN

If you're worried about surveillance you should probably know governments already have your data right now... they issue your passports/ids/etc...This is to just allow you to sign in to other parties with your government ID if needed. (instead of other parties asking you for passport/ID for compliance/KYC)

woah Jan 22, 2015 View on HN

The vast majority of people who look at my driver's license are not the working for the government. The vast majority of people who use any identity are not the government. The government simply provides a form of verification because we have nothing better. They will punish you if you counterfeit a piece of physical identity, so this discourages counterfeits. A trust-based cryptographic network could conceivably serve part of that purpose, by making explicit and immediately verifiable the

TremendousJudge Jul 25, 2023 View on HN

A government ID is a lot more than that. I have an official ID card that has:- A bunch of personal identifying data including a unique number (which is as much of a secret as my name or my date of birth)- A bunch of old-timey security stuff like thumbprint and signature- An RFID chip containing all this info, ICAO 9303 compliant- A PIN protected certificate that I can use to sign documents digitally- Several security measures to make falsifying it very hardEverybody who lives i

anonfordays Oct 23, 2024 View on HN

I'm with you, it's sadly the nature of the beast. Think about the federal government alone: DoD military ID, veteran's ID, passport, social security card, etc. are all separate organizations with different scopes. It's madness.