Replication Crisis

This cluster discusses the replication crisis in scientific research, focusing on the low reproducibility rates of studies, particularly in fields like psychology, and debates on trusting unreplicated results.

πŸ“‰ Falling 0.3x Science
4,865
Comments
20
Years Active
5
Top Authors
#528
Topic ID

Activity Over Time

2007
3
2008
3
2009
29
2010
31
2011
31
2012
71
2013
148
2014
122
2015
235
2016
328
2017
291
2018
441
2019
338
2020
339
2021
425
2022
455
2023
765
2024
483
2025
291
2026
38

Keywords

yourlogicalfallacyis.com OP IMO petewarden.com en.m SCIENCE i.e wikipedia.org replication science crisis experiment experiments reproducible study results findings data

Sample Comments

flukus β€’ Jan 29, 2018 β€’ View on HN

Unfortunately it is: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Replication_crisis

SkinTaco β€’ Mar 18, 2024 β€’ View on HN

It might be more possible than you think https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Replication_crisis

chrisco255 β€’ Oct 26, 2020 β€’ View on HN

No, you don't: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Replication_crisis

carsongross β€’ Sep 20, 2016 β€’ View on HN

Here's why:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Replication_crisis

coolhand2120 β€’ Dec 3, 2023 β€’ View on HN

Perhaps you’re not looking hard enough https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Replication_crisis

adwn β€’ Sep 19, 2025 β€’ View on HN

No idea why this is getting downvoted. Everything I wrote is true and directly on topic. Further reading: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Replication_crisis

bobcostas55 β€’ Oct 15, 2016 β€’ View on HN

When <50% of results in a particular field can be replicated, should you trust the experts of that field?

jsbg β€’ May 13, 2025 β€’ View on HN

what are your thoughts on the replication crisis?

justinpombrio β€’ Oct 20, 2022 β€’ View on HN

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Replication_crisis

carsongross β€’ Sep 20, 2016 β€’ View on HN

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Replication_crisis